Laserfiche WebLink
3.8 <br />P:1Data1GENICWCB1138372 - Animas -La Plata Demand Study tDeiiverableslReportslFinallALP Cost Demand Study Final Report.docx. <br />Table 3-4. Interview <br />Results <br />Quedion <br />13,11 <br />1 <br />What is the range in quantity of A-LP Project water <br />None. Contract is in place <br />Unknown. Demand study is <br />underway. LPWWA <br />—400 AF identified by SWSI. <br />None. Future water supplies <br />None. Future water supplies <br />None. Bayfield has a small <br />None. Ignacio purchases <br />potable water from Utes. <br />provider rid � interested in � <br />Wig <br />with Colorado Water and <br />500 -1,000 AF <br />anticipates LDWA will be a <br />will come from the Dry Gulch <br />will Dome from the Dry Gulch <br />demand and has WTP on <br />Ignacio would prefer to keep <br />Power Authority for supplies. <br />raw water customer. <br />Protect. <br />Project. <br />the Vallecito Reservoir, <br />, <br />relationship with Tribes. <br />Water providers willingness to take the State's Chair on <br />Durango already has a place <br />District unaware of A -LP <br />NIA. District is working on <br />WA. District is working on <br />the A-LP Association Boards <br />Prof <br />on the Association Board. <br />Project Association. <br />Unknown <br />Unknown <br />acquiring supplies from Dry <br />acquiring supplies from Dry <br />N/A <br />NIA <br />Gulch Project. <br />Gulch Project. <br />The level of interest and the provider's ability to participate <br />Durango already has a place <br />District unaware of A -LP <br />LPWWA would participate if <br />in the operation of the A-LP P <br />opera ' Project Association? <br />on the Association Board. <br />Project Association. <br />enough water was leased. <br />Unknown <br />WA <br />NIA <br />NIA <br />NIA <br />Originally estimated at <br />Range discussed is feasible, <br />Range discussed is feasible, <br />The range of cost per AF of the provider would be willing <br />WA <br />Estimated range of $2,500- <br />$1,400 per AF. They were <br />Estimated $3,000 per AF. <br />however , distance from <br />, <br />however , distance from <br />, <br />WA <br />NIA <br />to pay? <br />$3,500 per AF. <br />informed of $3,315 <br />source makes acquisition a <br />source makes acquisition a <br />low probability. <br />low probability. <br />La Plata Archuleta does not <br />La Plata West does not have <br />Authority cannot add new <br />Water treatment plant is <br />When would the water provider want to begin receiving its <br />N/A <br />have demand at this time, <br />demand at this time, but is <br />taps without securing <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />nearing capacity, but source <br />wate? <br />but is looking within the next <br />looking within the next 10 <br />additional supply and <br />is from Pine River. Looking <br />WA <br />10 years. <br />years. <br />requires supply immediately. <br />at plant expansion. <br />Whether the water provider would consider leasing water <br />Durango is not considering <br />Not considering leasing at <br />La Plata West would <br />Not known <br />NIA U <br />NIA <br />Unknown <br />NIA <br />from the local tribes? <br />leasing water from. <br />this time <br />consider leasing from Tribes <br />From whom the water providers world prefer to buy water <br />if the suppkw were in the mark? <br />State <br />State <br />State or Tribes <br />State <br />State <br />State <br />State or Tribes <br />Tribes <br />Would the water provider approve of lettuhg the State's <br />Durango would prefer that A- <br />LP Project water would be <br />Would prefer to own water <br />La Plata West would be <br />Bayfield would be amenable <br />Ignacio would prefer to keep <br />and th <br />ALP allocation revert to the Tribes en purchase or <br />amenable to leasing water <br />Not known <br />NIA <br />NIA <br />lease this water from the Trim in the Ain? <br />used for Colorado River <br />resources <br />from Tribes. <br />to leasing water from Tribes. <br />relationship with Tribes. <br />Compact purposes. <br />What are the major obstacles to your ogIarlization <br />Durango is not considering <br />Capital investment for water <br />Capital investment for water <br />Capital investment for water <br />some of the State's A-LP Water? <br />Pali �� <br />this option. <br />and infrastructure costs. <br />and infrastructure costs. <br />and infrastructure costs. <br />Distance from A -LP Project. <br />Distance from A -LP Project . <br />Distance from A -LP Project. <br />Distance from A -LP Project. <br />What would be necessary to eliminate any obstacles to <br />Durango is not considering, <br />Assistance in infrastructure <br />Assistance needed for <br />Assistance with infrastructure <br />Assistance with infrastructure <br />Assistance with <br />purchasing some of the State's adoration of A-LP Project <br />has contract in place. <br />Assistance in financing. <br />development. <br />purchasing water and <br />construction and 0 &M costs. <br />construction and 0 &M costs. <br />infrastructure construction <br />N/A <br />water? <br />treatment improvements <br />and 0 &M costs. <br />3.8 <br />P:1Data1GENICWCB1138372 - Animas -La Plata Demand Study tDeiiverableslReportslFinallALP Cost Demand Study Final Report.docx. <br />