Laserfiche WebLink
Loan Feasibility Study for <br />Raw Water Acquisition and Utilization <br />Page 43 <br />is in excess of the current statewide average. It is slightly in excess of the 2003/2004 state averages <br />that were over $36.00 per month. The rate, although exceeding the state average, is viewed as <br />reasonable. Of note, the 3.0 mill levy is currently programmed to sunset in 2019 based upon the <br />voters' authorization; however, the District will have five years of additional revenue accumulated <br />prior to the initiation of debt service on the CWCB loan. Those funds will be channeled into the <br />COLOTRUST restricted fund account. The new funds coupled with the existing retained funds and <br />associated interest earnings will be maintained in the restricted account. They can then be utilized to <br />begin covering the loss of the $64,000 of ad valorem tax income occurring in the year 2020. The <br />retained funds with accumulated compounding interest will provide for an additional 10 to 15 years <br />of revenue to offset the $64,000 annual loss carrying the supplemental funding through 2030 to <br />2035. <br />The District's interim interest cost as the CWCB loan is drawn down from 2007 through 2010 <br />represents costs that can be covered by the District's current revenue stream versus expenditures or <br />if need be, said costs can be covered through either the utilization of retained earnings or a stepped <br />increase in the ERU charges. Potential water rate increases to occur over this period to cover the <br />interim interest expenses would equate to $3.00 per ERU in 2007, $5.30 per ERU in 2008, $7.50 per <br />ERU in 2009 and subsequently $9.25 per ERU in 2010. The degree to which the District may desire <br />to modify the ERU rate structure downward from that shown is a function of the magnitude of <br />retained earnings that the District's board determines to apply toward the project. The following <br />cash flow projections shown on Table 15 have been prepared for the District's projected revenues <br />and expenditures covering all District operations. The projections cover the full 30 -year period <br />associated with the forthcoming CWCB loan. <br />7.4 LOAN REPAYMENT SOURCES <br />As discussed within this section's previous paragraphs, the District will use a combination of water <br />sales revenues and property taxes authorized under a voter referendum (in a manner that precludes <br />them from having TABOR implications for utilization within the Enterprise Fund) to fund the <br />CWCB debt service associated with the acquisition and development of the new water rights. <br />Existing revenue streams that will be applied to the CWCB loan servicing include $21,689 annually <br />of prior debt service revenue now applied to the existing DOLA EMIA and USDA RD loans. That <br />source of funds is generated from a $1.20 per ERU set aside within the base water sales assessment. <br />Those funds are directed to the Enterprise budget to pay for debt service currently on the two <br />existing loans. Upon paying off the two existing loans, those funds will be channeled directly to <br />service the CWCB debt. <br />Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc. August 2006 — 1018PEN05 <br />GMS, Inc. <br />