My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation With Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-Charge Deliveries
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 4:58:00 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 3:29:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
For the River Colorado Water Conservancy District
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
1
Date
10/1/2000
Author
Helton & Williamsen, P.C.
Title
Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operation with Respect to East Slope Diversions and Non-charge Deliveries
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1983 -98, which would have nearly met the goal of 20,000 acre -feet. Increased <br />diversions of Big Thompson River water and the elimination of the historical non - charge <br />deliveries would have increased the spring peak flows by an average of 74,409 acre - <br />feet. <br />8. The practice of carrying over C -BT quota water from one year to the next is an element <br />in the changed operation of Carter Lake and Horsetooth Reservoir that has occurred <br />since the early 1980s. Storage carried over from one year to the next at least potentially <br />limits the ability to divert Big Thompson River water and make it part of the project water <br />supply. We have not specifically considered this practice in this analysis, but it may be <br />desirable to do so at some time in the future. <br />9. From this analysis, it is clear that an earlier filling of Carter Lake and Horsetooth <br />Reservoir and the operation of the non - charge program tend to enhance the yield of the <br />Windy Gap Project. An earlier filling makes additional storage space available in Granby <br />Reservoir to store Windy Gap water and reduces the prospect of a spill from Granby <br />Reservoir. In addition, an earlier filling makes additional capacity available in the Adams <br />and Olympus Tunnels for the non - charge program, which also makes additional storage <br />space available in Granby Reservoir. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.