Laserfiche WebLink
E <br />h <br />�J <br />1 <br />u <br />0 <br />0 <br />n <br />approximately 13,000 acre -feet annually and would have reduced target flow shortages <br />by an average of approximately 3,600 acre -feet annually. <br />3. Our analysis showed that Carter Lake and Horsetooth Reservoir can be operated so that <br />all or nearly all of the in- priority Big Thompson River water can be diverted and made <br />part of the project water supply without reducing the historical yield to the C -BT unit <br />owners. <br />4. The C -BT Project delivered an average 37,800 acre -feet of non - charge water during <br />1983 -98. These non - charge deliveries occurred in 1983 -87 and 1995 -98 or 9 of the 16 <br />years in the study period, and amounted to about 18 percent of the total deliveries. <br />Annual non - charge deliveries during this period exceeded 100,000 acre -feet in 1986 and <br />1987 and approached 100,000 acre -feet in 1997. Prior to 1983, non - charge deliveries <br />occurred in only 1962 and 1971. <br />5. The non - charge water delivered to the Big Thompson River during water years 1983 -98 <br />was not fully diverted by the water users on the Big Thompson River. These non - charge <br />deliveries averaged 8,730 acre -feet annually over the 16 -year period and amounted to <br />as much as 46,929 acre -feet in 1986. Our flow calculations and comparisons indicated <br />that an average of only 3,423 acre -feet annually of this water was diverted by Big <br />Thompson River water users. Thus, an average of 39.3 percent of the total was not <br />diverted on the Big Thompson River. While this analysis considered only water uses on <br />the Big Thompson River, the fact that calls were not occurring on the South Platte River <br />on the days when this undiverted non - charge water was being delivered would indicate <br />that it was not being diverted or used on the South Platte River either. Our inspection of <br />the records for the flow in the South Platte River below the mouth of the Big Thompson <br />River tends to confirm this. Also, our inspection of the flow records for the Cache La <br />Poudre for the times when the non - charge water was being delivered indicated that <br />similar conclusions can be made with respect to the non - charge deliveries to the Cache <br />La Poudre. <br />6. Reductions in the non - charge deliveries during 1983 -98 obviously would have reduced <br />the Adams Tunnel diversions and the target flow shortages in the 15 -Mile Reach. Our <br />analysis indicated that the elimination of the non - charge deliveries would have reduced <br />these shortages by an average of 13,349 acre -feet annually when combined with <br />increased utilization of Big Thompson River water. <br />7. Increased diversions of the Big Thompson River water and reduced or precluded <br />deliveries of non - charge deliveries would have enhanced the spring peak flows in the <br />15 -Mile Reach significantly through increased spills from Granby Reservoir and would <br />have accomplished or largely accomplished the CFOPS goals in this regard. Our <br />analysis indicated that increased east slope diversions would have increased the spring <br />peak flows by an average of 18,498 acre -feet in the middle -range flow years during <br />18 <br />