Laserfiche WebLink
Single Flow Fishability Assessment <br />Objective <br />Assess the potential quality of fishing <br />opportunities, and estimate flow ranges, <br />through reconnaissance of the river at a <br />single flow. <br />Typical approach <br />Parallel to boating feasibility assessments, <br />experienced anglers usually participate <br />in the reconnaissance, and an <br />evaluation form may be used. Focus <br />group discussion after reconnaissance <br />helps summarize opinions about the <br />likely availability of different fishing <br />opportunities (defined by species, tackle, <br />and technique), possible flow ranges, and <br />potential project effects. <br />Product <br />Summary of reconnaissance effort and <br />consensus findings. Lists of participants, <br />evaluation results, and discussion notes <br />may be provided in appendices. <br />Responsibilities <br />Utilities (or their consultants) have <br />primary responsibility, but agencies and <br />stakeholders commonly participate in <br />fieldwork and review the evaluation form <br />or list of participants. <br />Flows for boat -based fishing may be different from <br />flows for wading or shore -based fishing. <br />Right: Situk River, Alaska, where most anglers wade, <br />but some use boats to access fishing areas. <br />Additional issues <br />Fishability assessments typically occur <br />from land, but it may be useful to have <br />anglers wade or boat the river if those <br />are a common component of target <br />opportunities. <br />It is challenging to assess a diversity of <br />potential fishing locations during a short <br />assessment period (a few hours or a day). <br />Similarly, there are trade -offs between <br />the number of sites and the quality of <br />assessments, or between organized visits <br />to specific locations and more "freelance" <br />evaluations by individual anglers. These <br />decisions are typically made on a case - <br />by -case basis after considering segment <br />characteristics, likely fishing opportunities, <br />existing use, or other factors. <br />Fishability assessments may be <br />unnecessary or less formal if a controlled <br />flow study is expected, or anglers currently <br />use a reach (and work can document their <br />use patterns and flow ranges of interest). <br />Unlike boating, the "feasibility" of fishing <br />is usually not in question; the focus is on <br />the quality of access to fishable water at <br />different flows. <br />As with boating feasibility assessments, <br />composition of the participants is <br />important and may be improved by <br />including local area guides or review by <br />stakeholders and agencies. <br />Fishing assessments need to address <br />potentially confounding evaluation issues <br />related to longer -term fishing success or <br />the condition of the fishery. For more <br />information, see sidebar on "fishability, <br />fishing, and the fishery." <br />Cautions & limitations <br />Fishability assessments at a single flow <br />may be able to demonstrate whether a <br />flow provides fishable water, but they are <br />unlikely to provide precise flow ranges for <br />different opportunities (unless the range is <br />narrow and a flow in that range <br />was assessed). <br />Fishability studies are only one <br />component of assessing flow needs for <br />fishing opportunities. Fishability studies <br />generally focus on access to fishable water, <br />offering less information about long term <br />fishing success or effects on the fishery <br />(see sidebar on these distinctions). <br />Flows and Recreation: 117 <br />A Guide for River Professionals <br />