My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Flows and Recretion: A guide to studies for river professionals
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Flows and Recretion: A guide to studies for river professionals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 5:09:46 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 2:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Date
10/1/2005
Author
Doug whittaker, Bo Shelby & John Gangemi
Title
Flows and Recreation - A guide to studies for river professionals
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
On -Water Boating Feasibility Assessment <br />Objective <br />Assess the feasibility and potential quality <br />of boating opportunities and estimate flow <br />ranges by boating the river at a single flow. <br />Typical approach <br />Similar to an on -land boating assessment, <br />experienced boaters usually participate <br />in the reconnaissance, and an evaluation <br />form may be developed to quantify <br />findings. The difference is that the <br />reconnaissance includes boating on the <br />reach. Focus group discussion after <br />the run is used to summarize opinions <br />about the feasibility of boating, types of <br />opportunities, possible flow ranges, and <br />potential project effects. <br />Product <br />Summary of reconnaissance effort and <br />findings. List of participants, evaluation <br />results, and discussion notes may be <br />provided in appendices. <br />Responsibilities <br />As with on -land boating assessments, <br />utilities (or their consultants) have <br />primary responsibility, but agencies and <br />stakeholders commonly participate in <br />fieldwork and review the evaluation form. <br />Recreation groups can provide valuable <br />assistance rounding up participants. <br />Additional issues <br />As with on -land boating assessments, <br />composition of the participants is critical <br />and may be improved with stakeholder <br />and agency review. <br />Safety and liability issues may be <br />important, particularly on reaches that <br />have had little or no previous boating use, <br />or have more challenging whitewater (see <br />sidebar on safety and liability). <br />On -water boating assessments may be a <br />planned interim step when a controlled <br />flow study is planned; when this occurs, <br />fewer participants and a professional <br />judgment -level analysis rather than <br />formalized evaluations may be sufficient <br />and minimize costs. The feasibility <br />assessment may lay groundwork or <br />provide valuable logistical information for <br />later in -depth studies. <br />Cautions & limitations <br />On -water boating feasibility assessments <br />at a single flow may demonstrate whether <br />boating is possible, but they are unlikely <br />to provide precise estimates of flow ranges <br />for boating (unless the range is narrow <br />and reconnaissance fortuitously occurred <br />within that range). <br />An on -water boating study on the Lower Carmen By- <br />pass Reach on Oregon's McKenzie River was conducted <br />at 330 cfs. Kayakers successfully boated the reach, but <br />the short run had difficult access, many log portages, <br />and less - interesting- than - expected whitewater. Ad- <br />ditional boating studies were not recommended. <br />16 I Flows and Recreation: <br />A Guide for River Professionals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.