My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resources Chairman James V. Hansen's Remarks for 02-16-02 Grand Island, NE Hearing
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Resources Chairman James V. Hansen's Remarks for 02-16-02 Grand Island, NE Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2013 2:58:14 PM
Creation date
3/4/2013 4:32:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
NE
CO
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/16/2002
Author
PRRIP
Title
ContinuedTestimony before the US House of Representatives Committee on Resources
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
program won't work for the species or the people who live on the land. On private lands, incentives <br />and involvement makes a lot more sense than regulations and resentment. <br />Others in the state share this view. This was demonstrated several years ago when we participated in a <br />diverse group of Nebraskans convened by Senator Bob Kerrey to find common ground on <br />reauthorization of the ESA. There was more consensus than some might imagine, and all agreed that <br />the ESA could be improved with: <br />• Greater stakeholder and public involvement in the process; <br />• Decisions based on good science and peer review; <br />• Emphasis on recovery planning crafted to reduce conflict with economic activities; <br />• Financial incentives for landowners; <br />• An educational and technical assistance program for the public and landowners; and <br />• Increased appropriations for impacted federal agencies. <br />These ESA improvements that were envisioned five years ago could be used to describe the goals of <br />the Platte River Cooperative Agreement today. <br />Stakeholder involvement should be at the top of any conservation agenda, and it has certainly been a <br />priority of the Cooperative Agreement. This involvement is formally recognized on the agreement's <br />Governance Committee, which includes state, federal, water, and conservation interests on a ten - <br />member board that requires nine votes to act. Involvement is further magnified through Governance <br />Committee meetings, sub - committees, state advisory groups, education, and communication among the <br />various participants and their peers. The Cooperative Agreement may be lacking in some things, but <br />stakeholders and their opinions are not among them! <br />This is a strength because the outcome can only be a program with a solid scientific foundation that is <br />crafted to reduce economic conflicts. There is recognition that the Platte's loss of habitat and flows <br />must be reversed, but any program should be voluntary, with financial incentives for the conservation <br />of water and land. There is also an agreement to minimize adverse third -party impacts that can be <br />readily identified. Any action under the program will be measured for its benefits to the species, and as <br />better science becomes available, management will adapt accordingly to maximize the results for each <br />dollar spent. <br />This is the way the ESA should work, and it is worth pursuing because the stakes are so high. To <br />understand what is at stake, I would remind you that it took over 13 years and more than $30 million to <br />relicense Kingsley Dam. If the Cooperative Agreement fails, not only would Kingsley's license be <br />subject to further review, every project in the basin could be subjected to proportional scrutiny and <br />costs, which means that lawyers would do very well at the expense of the water users and wildlife. <br />While there is much to lose if this effort fails, the payoff from success will be equally dramatic. ESA <br />conflicts that have persisted on the Platte for 20 years would finally be resolved throughout the entire <br />basin, bringing some much needed regulatory certainty to those involved. In addition to enhancing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.