Laserfiche WebLink
AUdUbOn NEBRASKA <br />To: The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Resources <br />From: Dave Sands, Executive Director, Audubon Nebraska <br />RE: Testimony in favor of the Platte River Cooperative Agreement <br />Date: February 16, 2002 <br />P.O. Box 117 <br />11700 SW tooth Street <br />Denton, NE 68339 <br />Tel: 402- 797 -2301 <br />Fax: 402 - 797-2304 <br />www.audubon.org <br />Up until five years ago, I enjoyed a very different career, as my brother and I ran a third - generation <br />meat business that produced steaks from Nebraska Beef. I was raised with an appreciation for the <br />cattle industry in our state, and my father also instilled a deep appreciation for Nebraska's rivers, <br />prairies, and wildlife. <br />My love of the outdoors eventually led to a membership in Audubon, and on occasion, I would <br />volunteer to represent Nebraska Audubon's positions in the state Legislature. About a decade ago, I <br />was approached by Audubon's national office to become involved in a federal process —the FERC <br />relicensing of Kingsley Dam. <br />From a business standpoint, I understood that farmers needed the flows that Kingsley provided, to <br />grow the corn that fed the cattle that our company processed and sold nationwide. I was keenly aware <br />of all the families that depended upon that chain of events, from the sandhills rancher's to my own. In <br />addition, the river provided power, recreation, and drinking water for millions of people throughout the <br />basin. Clearly, there were human uses that needed to be preserved. <br />From a conservation perspective, the case was also compelling. The Platte River is a world -class <br />wildlife resource that annually attracts millions of waterfowl, the largest gathering of cranes on earth, <br />and regular visits from some of the rarest cranes on earth. Habitat for these birds had steadily declined <br />over the past century due to a substantial reduction in the river's flows, and new projects threatened the <br />flows that were left. Above all, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) now required any water project in <br />the basin with a federal connection to address these concerns, and Kingsley Dam was at the front of the <br />line. <br />Given these facts, I recognized the obvious. The Platte River is so important for both agriculture and <br />wildlife that we can not afford to harm either one. For this reason, I told our national office that I <br />would jump into Platte issues on two conditions: that we base our positions on the best science <br />available, and never advocate for the taking of water from an existing irrigator. Audubon agreed, and <br />we have been working toward that end ever since. <br />At Audubon Nebraska, this philosophy is not confined to the Platte River, as the organization actively <br />pursues collaboration over confrontation, especially when it comes to the ESA. In a state where 97 <br />percent of the land is in private hands, meeting the concerns of landowners is vital, or a recovery <br />