My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:57 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the Governance Committee and Land Committee of the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/30/1999
Author
Marty Zeller, Conservation Partners and Mary Jane Graham
Title
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Land Entity White Paper November 30, 1999 <br />E. Constraints on an Entity Owning Land Under Nebraska Law <br />If Program habitat land is not to be held by a government, the Land Entity will <br />need to be a non - profit to hold lands in Nebraska. Article XII, Sec. 8 of the Nebraska <br />Constitution states that no corporation or syndicate shall acquire an interest in any title to <br />real estate used for farming or ranching. The term "syndicate" is defined very broadly <br />with the intention to exclude anyone other than farmers living on the land and their <br />families. Non - profit corporations are an exception to this prohibition. <br />V. Non -Legal Factors in Evaluating Options <br />In the interviews conducted with the signatories and stakeholders, a number of <br />policy or implementation issues were raised which are not strictly legal but which are <br />important to understanding how various parties will weigh the pros and cons of the land <br />protection options. They may be factors in evaluating whether the various potential Land <br />Entity structures meet Program needs. <br />Legislative Action Required — Given the high profile of the Cooperative Agreement, <br />legislative change may be plausible to accommodate some options that are not within the <br />state or federal authorities as they currently exist and are summarized above and in <br />Appendix A. As a practical matter, however, the more interaction required with federal <br />and state legislative bodies, the longer the process and the more potentially unpredictable <br />the results of such interaction. On the other hand, if achieved, legislative approval of any <br />selected approach will clearly validate the Program. <br />Certainty/Predictability — Concerns exist on all sides at finding a balance between <br />flexibility in decision making and assuring that the Land Entity carries out its tasks in a <br />manner that is consistent with Program intent and agreements, and does not develop an <br />independent mission. <br />Ability to Respond Quickly - In land negotiations, an ability to respond to landowner <br />circumstances quickly may mean the difference between success and failure. <br />Accountability - Activities and expenditures must meet the standards of fiscal <br />accountability and record - keeping of the four signatories. <br />Endangered Species Act - Actions of any Land Entity must meet Endangered Species <br />Act objectives of the Program. The signatories are all concerned that land protection <br />products are high quality, cost effective and a good return for the time and effort <br />expended. <br />Level of land%abitat protection achieved (temporary /permanent) - Some land <br />protection techniques will achieve protection for a term of years or of a temporary nature <br />such as leases and management agreements. Others, such as purchase of conservation <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.