My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:57 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 3:53:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for the Governance Committee and Land Committee of the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/30/1999
Author
Marty Zeller, Conservation Partners and Mary Jane Graham
Title
White Paper: Options for Managing the Land Protection Component of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Land Entity White Paper <br />November 30, 199' <br />Federal regulations prohibit persons who would personally benefit <br />from being part of the decision - making process in entities that are <br />to receive government funds. <br />Federal regulations are designed to avoid having a non - profit or <br />state or local government benefit from receiving federal funds <br />beyond the direct benefit intended by the grant or agreement. For <br />that reason, entities receiving federal funds generally cannot apply <br />them to administrative costs of the organization or invest them to <br />earn interest during the period between receiving the federal funds <br />and disbursing them for their intended use. <br />Real property acquisition using federal or state funds is subject to <br />government appraisal. <br />• If land is later sold, either the government must be repaid its share <br />of fair market value less selling expenses, or title must transfer to <br />the federal government in exchange for compensation <br />proportionate to the federal contribution to the fair market value of <br />the property, or another acceptable arrangement has to be worked <br />out that involves the land continuing to serve the government's <br />purpose <br />C. Constraints on Creation of a New Entity <br />Under 31 U.S.C. Sec. 9701, federal agencies cannot create a corporation to carry <br />out their functions. Where creation of a new Land Entity is one option contemplated, <br />DOI could be viewed as helping to create an entity to carry out its functions. If a new <br />entity with substantial responsibilities is to be created, Congress will need to authorize it. <br />Selecting an existing organization as Land Entity would, of course, pose no problems. <br />D. Constraints of the ESA <br />The Cooperative Agreement and proposed Program have taken great care not to <br />compromise the obligation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine and from <br />time to time to confirm that the Program is serving as a reasonable and prudent <br />alternative and avoiding jeopardy to the Program's target species. The Governance <br />Committee does not have the authority to override FWS, and thus it cannot delegate that <br />authority or contract it away. A Land Entity with bylaws or a charter that attempted to <br />override FWS's authority could not be funded. <br />F:1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.