My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Migration Dynamics of the Whooping Crane
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Migration Dynamics of the Whooping Crane
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 1:05:24 PM
Creation date
1/29/2013 2:31:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for Interstate Task Force on Endangered Species (related to the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP) - Colorado Water Congress, Nebraska Water Resources Association, Wyoming Water Development Association
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/1/1985
Author
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
Title
Migration Dynamics of the Whooping Crane with Emphasis on the Use of the Platte River in Nebraska
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TABLE 2 -4 CHARACTERISTICS OF ROOST SITES IN STANDING AND FLOWING WATER USED BY <br />MIGRATING WHOOPING CRANES <br />Habitat Characteristic <br />Standing Water (a) <br />Flowing Water (b) <br />Size <br />less than 1 acre to several thousand <br />relatively wide (60 -75 yards to <br />acres; sufficient shallow water to <br />over 400 yards); slow flowing (1 -4 <br />allow birds to roost 20 -30 feet from <br />mph) <br />shoreline or from dense emergent <br />vegetation <br />Water depth <br />less than 16 inches (3 -8 inches <br />all sites less than 12 inches, <br />optimum) <br />usually 2 to 6 inches; main channel <br />may be considerably deeper <br />Emergent or floating vegetation <br />little or none in immediate <br />none <br />vicinity of roost <br />Submergent vegetation <br />absent or only those that form mats <br />none <br />(e. g. , Myriophyl l um) <br />Bottan composition <br />finely divided substrate; e.g., <br />fine substrate, usually sand <br />sand, mud, or clay <br />Topographic relief <br />Variable ranging f ran 0 to over 30 <br />all roosts had sandbars nearby char - <br />feet within 150 yards of roost <br />acterized by gradual slope (often <br />(actual slopes into water rarely <br />(often less than 1 -20), little topo- <br />e)ceed 4 -50); probably will not <br />graphic relief (often less than 1 <br />use deep basins <br />foot), no banks over a few inches <br />high, and little or no vegetation <br />Horizontal visi bil ity <br />50 feet minimum in all directions; <br />usually unobstructed from riverbank <br />often 100 yards or more in most <br />to riverbank and at least several <br />directions <br />hundred yards up and downstream <br />Overhead visibil ity <br />unobstructed; no tall trees, thick <br />same, though river roosts are <br />shrubbery or high banks im immed- <br />usually isolated from developments <br />late vicinity of roosts <br />by tall trees and /or high banks <br />located at a distance which allows <br />suitable horizontal and overhead <br />visibil ity <br />Distance to feeding site <br />almost always within 12 -15 miles, <br />usually less than 1 mile or in <br />often within 1 mile or in immed- <br />immediate vicinity of roost; in <br />late vicinity of roost <br />Platte River Valley, feeding sites <br />have been documented within 3 miles <br />of the river <br />Distance from human development <br />300 to 400 yards (minimum) fran <br />roost is usually at least 1/4 mile <br />and /or disturbance <br />moderately used roads or other <br />from human developments; e. g. , <br />developments; 400 to 600 yards <br />roads, houses, and railroad tracks <br />(minimum) from unconcealed humans <br />(a) Source: Johnson and Temple (1980, pp. 39 -42), based on an evaluation of <br />57 standing water roost sites. <br />(b) Sources: Johnson and Temple (1980, pp. 42 -43), based on an evaluation of <br />7 riverine roost sites; and Johnson (1981, p. 40), based on an evaluation <br />of 10 riverine roost sites. <br />2 -15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.