Laserfiche WebLink
'It would seem to us that the [Platte] river provided much <br />higher 'quality' roosting habitat than the stockpond, and <br />that its associated wet meadows and agricultural fields <br />probably offered being mnervouspotential or of being under anycadditional ed <br />no signs <br />stress where they were." <br />Such quandary over the use of "lower quality" versus "higher quality" habitat <br />of course impl ies that whooping cranes view their options with the very <br />perspective and bias. Presented with a clear choice, however, <br />sel ecti on of one potential roost site over another would seem to indicate that, <br />as far as the cranes are concerned, the selected option is the most favorable <br />in meeting their overall stopover requirements. In other words, what is 11 ower <br />quality" to humans, may be "higher quality" to whooping cranes. <br />It is important to understand, too, that listings of confirmed sightings <br />represent nonsystematic data which are biased by the distribution of qualified <br />observers. As Johnson and Temple (1980, p. 65) pointed out, there is a much <br />s at <br />greater probabi l ity of detecti ng and reporti ng w hoopsii nagecr and pro poverty it dl if e <br />certain locations al ong the flyway (e. g. , federal, <br />refuges and preserves) where trained biologists and /or other experienced <br />observers are stationed in the field most of the time during the migration <br />seasons. On the other hand, the likelihood of detecting whooping crane <br />stopovers at i sol ated f a ponds, sukhabidtatsn other l <br />mayactual actually bee would be <br />frequent. <br />much less, even though the <br />such <br />Similarly, sighting efforts along the central Platte River have been enhanced <br />by intense censusi ng of sandhill cranes in this area since 1959 (the sandhil l <br />crane's spri ng stagi ng peri od overl aps much of the whoopi ng crane I s sons and <br />migration period through Nebraska) . In spite of this, <br />however, <br />Temple (1980, p. 21) reported that fran 1960 -1979 there were only three <br />confirmed sightings of whooping cranes on the Platte River, as compared atto <br />least 14 confirmed sightings on wetlands within 30 miles of the Platte, both <br />the north and south. In recent years, observation efforts along the Platte <br />have been further augmented by the presence of biologists employed by the <br />National Audubon Society's Lill ian Annette Rowe Sanctuary and the Whooping <br />Crane Habitat Maintenance Trust's Mormon Island preserve (both located along <br />the central reach of the river), as well as the Service's regional off ice in <br />Grand Island, Nebraska. Fran 1983 -1985 the Service, <br />in conjunction with the <br />Whooping Crane Trust, has made morning overflights of the Platte (f ran Chapman <br />to Lexington, Nebraska) , during 14 to 21 days of each migration season, to <br />search for whooping cranes roosting on the river (G. Poul l os 1985, personal <br />comm uni ca ti on) . Though such regular scrutiny of the Platte River may be <br />effective in more accurately documenting whooping crane use of this habitat, <br />increased confirmed s resulting ali�� survey is <br />may lead to misinterpretation of anarea' sreatveimpotancetomigratng <br />whooping cranes. <br />In view of the inherent bias in the confirmed sightings record, an important <br />objective of radio-tracking surveys initiated l to gather <br />more <br />co m pl ete information on the habits of migrati ngw hoopi ngcranesatoassess <br />2 -16 <br />