My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 10:59:20 AM
Creation date
1/29/2013 1:20:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Prepared for Interstate Task Force on Endangered Species (related to the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP), Colorado Water Congress, Nebraska Water Resources Association, Wyoming Water Development Association Tom Pitts, P.E. Task Force Coordinator
State
CO
WY
NE
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/1/1988
Author
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
Title
Status of the Interior Least Tern and Piping Plover in Nebraska (Period of Record through 1986)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the next. Nesting habitat associated with off -river sandpits (e.g., along the <br />Platte and Loup rivers) is also transient. With the passage of time, sandpit <br />spoil piles become overgrown with vegetation or are leveled to develop housing <br />or recreation areas. Consequently, a given site may be suitable for nesting <br />one year but absent or unsuitable the next. Such changes do.not necessarily <br />represent permanent losses of habitat inasmuch as suitable habitat may be <br />forming elsewhere. As Erwin (1984) pointed out, the propensity of least terns <br />to relocate their colonies within and between years makes breeding populations <br />appear unstable, but it may be this tendency that enables the species to <br />persist despite the hazards of flooding and other disturbances. This remark is <br />equally applicable to piping plovers. <br />If suitable habitat is not available at a previously used nesting site when <br />breeding birds arrive, they may select alternate sites (Wycoff 1960) or delay <br />nesting until sandbars or beach areas become exposed (Hardy 1957). Some <br />researchers (e.g., Renaud et al. 1979) have also noted that piping plovers may <br />shift their nesting locations from year to year for unknown reasons apparently <br />not related to changing habitat 'conditions. If selected sites become <br />unsuitable during the nesting season (due to flooding, human disturbance, or <br />other factors), nest relocation or renesting may occur. Late nesting and /or <br />renesting, however, may have a lower likelihood of success because of the time <br />budget required (Schulenberg et al. 1980, Wingfield 1982). <br />The inherent ability of least terns and piping plovers to adjust to temporal <br />differences in local habitat availability is further exemplified by shifts in <br />the utilization of riverine sandbar and off -river sandpit habitat along the <br />Platte River. During recent years (1985 and 1986), sandpit spoil piles near <br />the Platte have provided habitat for nearly half the breeding birds of both <br />species that nest along this river. When flood conditions reduce the amount of <br />mid - stream sandbar habitat, sandpits near the river assume even greater <br />importance to the extent that during years of extreme and prolonged high flows <br />(as in 1983 and 1984) they provide the only nesting habitat available. These <br />findings document the fact that sand and gravel mining along the Platte River <br />has created important supplemental nesting habitat for least terns and piping <br />plovers. <br />Least terns that nest at sandpits adjacent to the Platte River forage primarily <br />in shallow areas of the river to obtain food (i.e., small fish). Foraging is <br />apparently more limited on sandpits themselves because the steeper side - slopes <br />and general lack of shallow water areas characteristic of these sites are less <br />conducive to the capture of fish prey items. Thus, even during years when <br />mid - stream sandbars are inundated during the breeding season, the river <br />continues to play an important role as a foraging area for nearby least tern <br />colonies. In contrast, piping plovers feed mainly on aquatic invertebrates and <br />can presumably satisfy their dietary requirements by foraging along shoreline <br />margins associated with either riverine or sandpit habitat. <br />COLONY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS <br />Available data (though limited) do not indicate greater crowding at colonies <br />during years when high flows in the Platte River restricted nesting activity to <br />off -river sandpits. Measurements of area per colony, area per nest, and <br />inter -nest distances recorded at one river colony in 1985, when moderate flows <br />prevailed during the breeding season, fell within the range of values measured <br />iv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.