Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 BBC VIEWPOINT • January 2003 • BBC Redearch & Coddulting <br />Ensuring Fair Housing for All <br />Not too long ago, it was <br />legally permissible for lenders to <br />make loan decisions based on the <br />racial homogeneity of a neigh- <br />borhood. A landlord could refuse <br />to rent to a single woman with a <br />child. Real estate agents could <br />show clients houses only in <br />neighborhoods where they <br />would be "comfortable." <br />Then the Fair Housing Act <br />was adopted and those activities <br />became illegal. The Act — <br />enacted in 1968 and amended in <br />1988 — prohibits discrimina- <br />tion in the sale, rental and <br />financing of housing on the basis <br />Debunking thf <br />When Colorado land use deci- <br />sions meet public finance issues, <br />the conventional wisdom is sim- <br />ple — maximize retail develop- <br />ment and avoid residential <br />growth. <br />Retail development produces <br />sales tax revenue, the Holy Grail <br />of government resources. Resi- <br />dential development, on the <br />other hand, has an unfortunate <br />tendency to produce residents, <br />who in turn demand expensive <br />public services and generally <br />complicate the lives of public <br />officials. When contemplating <br />this situation, most local govern- <br />ments arrive at the same conclu- <br />sion: "our town is unusually <br />well suited for retail develop- <br />ment, but unfortunately, new <br />residential growth is perhaps <br />better suited for the town next <br />door." <br />Given this reality, why would <br />any local government accept res- <br />idential development and why <br />does BBC continuously advise <br />public sector clients to accept a <br />balance of residential and com- <br />mercial development? <br />There's no question that sales <br />tax is the engine driving Col- <br />orado municipal governments. <br />The question is how to attract <br />of race, color, national origin, sex, <br />disability, religion and familial <br />status. <br />End of story, right? <br />Wrong. Because these activi- <br />ties are illegal does not mean <br />they do not occur. <br />Discrimination in housing per- <br />sists for a number of reasons: <br />ignorance of fair housing rights <br />on the part of victims and viola- <br />tors, disobedience of the law by <br />housing professionals and lack of <br />enforcement of the Act, among <br />others. There are also perfectly <br />legal activities occurring in many <br />communities that may not <br />Retail Myth <br />more of it. The answer requires a <br />deeper look at the origins of new <br />sales tax and the recognition that <br />one cannot live by shopping <br />malls alone, or a corollary princi- <br />ple — it takes a village to pro- <br />duce retail sales (see chart). <br />Without residences ( "roof <br />tops" in developer jargon) new <br />retail tends to simply cannibalize <br />sales that already exists. The <br />addition of a new grocery store <br />next to an existing grocery store <br />produces only modest additional <br />sales and a lot of new automobile <br />traffic — not a particularly effec- <br />tive formula for community <br />health. New sales are only cre- <br />ated by new residents and busi- <br />nesses, additional spending by <br />existing residents and businesses, <br />or additional spending by resi- <br />dents and businesses from other <br />communities. In order to grow <br />the retail pie, new retail must <br />diversify a community's offerings <br />and thus stem current sales leak- <br />age or conversely, attract new <br />sales from a broader market area. <br />It is certainly tempting to <br />maintain an apparently practical <br />policy that promotes retail while <br />resisting residential. Unfortu- <br />nately, communities that have <br />aggressively engaged this policy <br />intend to restrict rights to fair <br />housing choice, but do so nonethe- <br />less. <br />Communities around the coun- <br />try have increasingly been con- <br />cerned about fair housing rights as <br />the supply of affordable housing <br />has dwindled and the future hous- <br />ing needs of aging populations <br />have come into focus. There has <br />also been regulatory pressure to <br />address fair housing issues: the <br />U.S. Department of Housing and <br />Urban Development (HUD) <br />requires an examination of fair <br />housing as a condition for receiv- <br />ing federal housing and commu- <br />Distribution <br />of White <br />Residents in <br />Marion County, <br />Indiana <br />in 2000 <br />Legend <br />are beginning to see its flaws. <br />Retail doesn't stand still. For <br />example, the primary source of <br />Boulder's considerable financial <br />strength, Crossroads Mall, is now <br />an antiquated and largely shut- <br />tered facility. The downturn of <br />Crossroads is largely due to rapid <br />residential growth along the <br />Highway 36 corridor and the <br />accompanying retail competition. <br />Ultimately, retail will follow <br />rooftops, and Boulder's long stand- <br />ing barriers to residential growth <br />left them vulnerable to retail <br />migration. <br />A second complication in the <br />nity development funds. <br />In 2002, BBC helped the <br />City of Indianapolis — which <br />has a history of struggling with <br />fair housing issues — identify <br />barriers to fair housing choice <br />within the city and its nine <br />townships. <br />The study revealed that <br />racial lines drawn in the past <br />are difficult to erase. In Indi- <br />anapolis, as in many cities, the <br />location where one lived was <br />once determined as much by <br />skin color as financial where- <br />withal and preferences. The <br />legal boundaries that in the <br />past mandated where residents <br />lived in Indianapolis have been <br />eliminated. But, as shown in <br />the accompanying graphic, <br />minorities continue to be con- <br />centrated in the central city, <br />while whites have settled in <br />more suburban areas. <br />Our study also showed that <br />the economic growth experi- <br />enced in the past decade broad- <br />ened the housing opportunities <br />of minorities in Indianapolis. <br />Census data show that the con- <br />centrations of African- Ameri- <br />cans living in the central city <br />declined between 1990 and <br />2000, while the proportions <br />living in areas outside of the <br />central city increased. <br />However, we found that the <br />protected classes continue to <br />face barriers to fair housing <br />choice in terms of accessing <br />credit for home mortgages and <br />home improvement loans. <br />"all retail strategy" is that retail <br />developers understand the situ- <br />ation and know that communi- <br />ties are willing to subsidize <br />their presence. As the demand <br />for retail has increased and as <br />attractive sites have decreased, <br />the public side of the typical <br />"public private partnership" <br />has grown. It turns out that <br />developers can run spreadsheets <br />too, and now it may cost as <br />much to attract desirable retail- <br />ers, as communities can receive <br />in benefits from their presence. <br />So how should communities <br />respond? Retail still matters <br />Origins of New Sales Tax Revenues <br />And, the study showed that <br />discriminatory activities related <br />to housing remain a problem. <br />The most common reason for <br />filing complaints about fair <br />housing discrimination is race. <br />This is true in Indianapolis, as <br />well as nationwide. <br />Finally, one of the largest bar- <br />riers to fair housing choice iden- <br />tified in the study was ignorance <br />— of the law, of one's rights, <br />and of what to do if discrimina- <br />tion is experienced. <br />Cities and states have come a <br />long way in providing fair hous- <br />ing opportunities for citizens. <br />Eliminating fair housing barri- <br />ers requires solid research to <br />identify the most serious issues, <br />a well- crafted plan to address <br />the top needs, and a continuing <br />evaluation of progress. BBC will <br />continue to assist communities <br />with the very important job of <br />ensuring fair housing choice for <br />all residents. <br />Heidi Aggeler, Jim Carpen- <br />ter and Tom Pippin direct <br />BBC's housing practice and <br />are currently conducting fair <br />housing studies for Lake <br />County, Indiana and the cities <br />of Las Cruces and Las Vegas. <br />Heidi andJen Garner recently <br />completed a statewide survey <br />in Colorado to assess citizens' <br />knowledge of fair housing law <br />and measure the types and fre- <br />quency of housing discrimina- <br />tion. <br />because communities cannot col- <br />lect sales tax without a point of <br />sale. However, old strategies of <br />saying no to residential and yes <br />to retail are shortsighted. Com- <br />munities must encourage resi- <br />dential, but in locations and <br />with designs that minimize ser- <br />vice costs and allow new resi- <br />dents to shop locally. Of equal <br />importance is a focus on reduc- <br />ing the burden of residential <br />development, using strategies, <br />such as impact fees and good <br />development design. Together, <br />this multi - pronged strategy is <br />more effective, sustainable and <br />financially viable than the tradi- <br />tional "retail only" approach to <br />land use policy. <br />Ford Frick, Jim Carpenter <br />and Tom Pippin collectively <br />have over 40 years of experience <br />in land use, market and fiscal <br />analyses for both public and <br />private clients. In 2002, BBC <br />represented clients in over a <br />dozen states involving issues of <br />how land use regulation and <br />growth management strategies <br />influence the fiscal well being <br />of local communities. <br />0 to 25% <br />- <br />26 to 50% <br />-51 <br />to 75% <br />- <br />76%+ <br />are beginning to see its flaws. <br />Retail doesn't stand still. For <br />example, the primary source of <br />Boulder's considerable financial <br />strength, Crossroads Mall, is now <br />an antiquated and largely shut- <br />tered facility. The downturn of <br />Crossroads is largely due to rapid <br />residential growth along the <br />Highway 36 corridor and the <br />accompanying retail competition. <br />Ultimately, retail will follow <br />rooftops, and Boulder's long stand- <br />ing barriers to residential growth <br />left them vulnerable to retail <br />migration. <br />A second complication in the <br />nity development funds. <br />In 2002, BBC helped the <br />City of Indianapolis — which <br />has a history of struggling with <br />fair housing issues — identify <br />barriers to fair housing choice <br />within the city and its nine <br />townships. <br />The study revealed that <br />racial lines drawn in the past <br />are difficult to erase. In Indi- <br />anapolis, as in many cities, the <br />location where one lived was <br />once determined as much by <br />skin color as financial where- <br />withal and preferences. The <br />legal boundaries that in the <br />past mandated where residents <br />lived in Indianapolis have been <br />eliminated. But, as shown in <br />the accompanying graphic, <br />minorities continue to be con- <br />centrated in the central city, <br />while whites have settled in <br />more suburban areas. <br />Our study also showed that <br />the economic growth experi- <br />enced in the past decade broad- <br />ened the housing opportunities <br />of minorities in Indianapolis. <br />Census data show that the con- <br />centrations of African- Ameri- <br />cans living in the central city <br />declined between 1990 and <br />2000, while the proportions <br />living in areas outside of the <br />central city increased. <br />However, we found that the <br />protected classes continue to <br />face barriers to fair housing <br />choice in terms of accessing <br />credit for home mortgages and <br />home improvement loans. <br />"all retail strategy" is that retail <br />developers understand the situ- <br />ation and know that communi- <br />ties are willing to subsidize <br />their presence. As the demand <br />for retail has increased and as <br />attractive sites have decreased, <br />the public side of the typical <br />"public private partnership" <br />has grown. It turns out that <br />developers can run spreadsheets <br />too, and now it may cost as <br />much to attract desirable retail- <br />ers, as communities can receive <br />in benefits from their presence. <br />So how should communities <br />respond? Retail still matters <br />Origins of New Sales Tax Revenues <br />And, the study showed that <br />discriminatory activities related <br />to housing remain a problem. <br />The most common reason for <br />filing complaints about fair <br />housing discrimination is race. <br />This is true in Indianapolis, as <br />well as nationwide. <br />Finally, one of the largest bar- <br />riers to fair housing choice iden- <br />tified in the study was ignorance <br />— of the law, of one's rights, <br />and of what to do if discrimina- <br />tion is experienced. <br />Cities and states have come a <br />long way in providing fair hous- <br />ing opportunities for citizens. <br />Eliminating fair housing barri- <br />ers requires solid research to <br />identify the most serious issues, <br />a well- crafted plan to address <br />the top needs, and a continuing <br />evaluation of progress. BBC will <br />continue to assist communities <br />with the very important job of <br />ensuring fair housing choice for <br />all residents. <br />Heidi Aggeler, Jim Carpen- <br />ter and Tom Pippin direct <br />BBC's housing practice and <br />are currently conducting fair <br />housing studies for Lake <br />County, Indiana and the cities <br />of Las Cruces and Las Vegas. <br />Heidi andJen Garner recently <br />completed a statewide survey <br />in Colorado to assess citizens' <br />knowledge of fair housing law <br />and measure the types and fre- <br />quency of housing discrimina- <br />tion. <br />because communities cannot col- <br />lect sales tax without a point of <br />sale. However, old strategies of <br />saying no to residential and yes <br />to retail are shortsighted. Com- <br />munities must encourage resi- <br />dential, but in locations and <br />with designs that minimize ser- <br />vice costs and allow new resi- <br />dents to shop locally. Of equal <br />importance is a focus on reduc- <br />ing the burden of residential <br />development, using strategies, <br />such as impact fees and good <br />development design. Together, <br />this multi - pronged strategy is <br />more effective, sustainable and <br />financially viable than the tradi- <br />tional "retail only" approach to <br />land use policy. <br />Ford Frick, Jim Carpenter <br />and Tom Pippin collectively <br />have over 40 years of experience <br />in land use, market and fiscal <br />analyses for both public and <br />private clients. In 2002, BBC <br />represented clients in over a <br />dozen states involving issues of <br />how land use regulation and <br />growth management strategies <br />influence the fiscal well being <br />of local communities. <br />