Page 6 BBC VIEWPOINT • January 2003 • BBC Redearch & Coddulting
<br />Ensuring Fair Housing for All
<br />Not too long ago, it was
<br />legally permissible for lenders to
<br />make loan decisions based on the
<br />racial homogeneity of a neigh-
<br />borhood. A landlord could refuse
<br />to rent to a single woman with a
<br />child. Real estate agents could
<br />show clients houses only in
<br />neighborhoods where they
<br />would be "comfortable."
<br />Then the Fair Housing Act
<br />was adopted and those activities
<br />became illegal. The Act —
<br />enacted in 1968 and amended in
<br />1988 — prohibits discrimina-
<br />tion in the sale, rental and
<br />financing of housing on the basis
<br />Debunking thf
<br />When Colorado land use deci-
<br />sions meet public finance issues,
<br />the conventional wisdom is sim-
<br />ple — maximize retail develop-
<br />ment and avoid residential
<br />growth.
<br />Retail development produces
<br />sales tax revenue, the Holy Grail
<br />of government resources. Resi-
<br />dential development, on the
<br />other hand, has an unfortunate
<br />tendency to produce residents,
<br />who in turn demand expensive
<br />public services and generally
<br />complicate the lives of public
<br />officials. When contemplating
<br />this situation, most local govern-
<br />ments arrive at the same conclu-
<br />sion: "our town is unusually
<br />well suited for retail develop-
<br />ment, but unfortunately, new
<br />residential growth is perhaps
<br />better suited for the town next
<br />door."
<br />Given this reality, why would
<br />any local government accept res-
<br />idential development and why
<br />does BBC continuously advise
<br />public sector clients to accept a
<br />balance of residential and com-
<br />mercial development?
<br />There's no question that sales
<br />tax is the engine driving Col-
<br />orado municipal governments.
<br />The question is how to attract
<br />of race, color, national origin, sex,
<br />disability, religion and familial
<br />status.
<br />End of story, right?
<br />Wrong. Because these activi-
<br />ties are illegal does not mean
<br />they do not occur.
<br />Discrimination in housing per-
<br />sists for a number of reasons:
<br />ignorance of fair housing rights
<br />on the part of victims and viola-
<br />tors, disobedience of the law by
<br />housing professionals and lack of
<br />enforcement of the Act, among
<br />others. There are also perfectly
<br />legal activities occurring in many
<br />communities that may not
<br />Retail Myth
<br />more of it. The answer requires a
<br />deeper look at the origins of new
<br />sales tax and the recognition that
<br />one cannot live by shopping
<br />malls alone, or a corollary princi-
<br />ple — it takes a village to pro-
<br />duce retail sales (see chart).
<br />Without residences ( "roof
<br />tops" in developer jargon) new
<br />retail tends to simply cannibalize
<br />sales that already exists. The
<br />addition of a new grocery store
<br />next to an existing grocery store
<br />produces only modest additional
<br />sales and a lot of new automobile
<br />traffic — not a particularly effec-
<br />tive formula for community
<br />health. New sales are only cre-
<br />ated by new residents and busi-
<br />nesses, additional spending by
<br />existing residents and businesses,
<br />or additional spending by resi-
<br />dents and businesses from other
<br />communities. In order to grow
<br />the retail pie, new retail must
<br />diversify a community's offerings
<br />and thus stem current sales leak-
<br />age or conversely, attract new
<br />sales from a broader market area.
<br />It is certainly tempting to
<br />maintain an apparently practical
<br />policy that promotes retail while
<br />resisting residential. Unfortu-
<br />nately, communities that have
<br />aggressively engaged this policy
<br />intend to restrict rights to fair
<br />housing choice, but do so nonethe-
<br />less.
<br />Communities around the coun-
<br />try have increasingly been con-
<br />cerned about fair housing rights as
<br />the supply of affordable housing
<br />has dwindled and the future hous-
<br />ing needs of aging populations
<br />have come into focus. There has
<br />also been regulatory pressure to
<br />address fair housing issues: the
<br />U.S. Department of Housing and
<br />Urban Development (HUD)
<br />requires an examination of fair
<br />housing as a condition for receiv-
<br />ing federal housing and commu-
<br />Distribution
<br />of White
<br />Residents in
<br />Marion County,
<br />Indiana
<br />in 2000
<br />Legend
<br />are beginning to see its flaws.
<br />Retail doesn't stand still. For
<br />example, the primary source of
<br />Boulder's considerable financial
<br />strength, Crossroads Mall, is now
<br />an antiquated and largely shut-
<br />tered facility. The downturn of
<br />Crossroads is largely due to rapid
<br />residential growth along the
<br />Highway 36 corridor and the
<br />accompanying retail competition.
<br />Ultimately, retail will follow
<br />rooftops, and Boulder's long stand-
<br />ing barriers to residential growth
<br />left them vulnerable to retail
<br />migration.
<br />A second complication in the
<br />nity development funds.
<br />In 2002, BBC helped the
<br />City of Indianapolis — which
<br />has a history of struggling with
<br />fair housing issues — identify
<br />barriers to fair housing choice
<br />within the city and its nine
<br />townships.
<br />The study revealed that
<br />racial lines drawn in the past
<br />are difficult to erase. In Indi-
<br />anapolis, as in many cities, the
<br />location where one lived was
<br />once determined as much by
<br />skin color as financial where-
<br />withal and preferences. The
<br />legal boundaries that in the
<br />past mandated where residents
<br />lived in Indianapolis have been
<br />eliminated. But, as shown in
<br />the accompanying graphic,
<br />minorities continue to be con-
<br />centrated in the central city,
<br />while whites have settled in
<br />more suburban areas.
<br />Our study also showed that
<br />the economic growth experi-
<br />enced in the past decade broad-
<br />ened the housing opportunities
<br />of minorities in Indianapolis.
<br />Census data show that the con-
<br />centrations of African- Ameri-
<br />cans living in the central city
<br />declined between 1990 and
<br />2000, while the proportions
<br />living in areas outside of the
<br />central city increased.
<br />However, we found that the
<br />protected classes continue to
<br />face barriers to fair housing
<br />choice in terms of accessing
<br />credit for home mortgages and
<br />home improvement loans.
<br />"all retail strategy" is that retail
<br />developers understand the situ-
<br />ation and know that communi-
<br />ties are willing to subsidize
<br />their presence. As the demand
<br />for retail has increased and as
<br />attractive sites have decreased,
<br />the public side of the typical
<br />"public private partnership"
<br />has grown. It turns out that
<br />developers can run spreadsheets
<br />too, and now it may cost as
<br />much to attract desirable retail-
<br />ers, as communities can receive
<br />in benefits from their presence.
<br />So how should communities
<br />respond? Retail still matters
<br />Origins of New Sales Tax Revenues
<br />And, the study showed that
<br />discriminatory activities related
<br />to housing remain a problem.
<br />The most common reason for
<br />filing complaints about fair
<br />housing discrimination is race.
<br />This is true in Indianapolis, as
<br />well as nationwide.
<br />Finally, one of the largest bar-
<br />riers to fair housing choice iden-
<br />tified in the study was ignorance
<br />— of the law, of one's rights,
<br />and of what to do if discrimina-
<br />tion is experienced.
<br />Cities and states have come a
<br />long way in providing fair hous-
<br />ing opportunities for citizens.
<br />Eliminating fair housing barri-
<br />ers requires solid research to
<br />identify the most serious issues,
<br />a well- crafted plan to address
<br />the top needs, and a continuing
<br />evaluation of progress. BBC will
<br />continue to assist communities
<br />with the very important job of
<br />ensuring fair housing choice for
<br />all residents.
<br />Heidi Aggeler, Jim Carpen-
<br />ter and Tom Pippin direct
<br />BBC's housing practice and
<br />are currently conducting fair
<br />housing studies for Lake
<br />County, Indiana and the cities
<br />of Las Cruces and Las Vegas.
<br />Heidi andJen Garner recently
<br />completed a statewide survey
<br />in Colorado to assess citizens'
<br />knowledge of fair housing law
<br />and measure the types and fre-
<br />quency of housing discrimina-
<br />tion.
<br />because communities cannot col-
<br />lect sales tax without a point of
<br />sale. However, old strategies of
<br />saying no to residential and yes
<br />to retail are shortsighted. Com-
<br />munities must encourage resi-
<br />dential, but in locations and
<br />with designs that minimize ser-
<br />vice costs and allow new resi-
<br />dents to shop locally. Of equal
<br />importance is a focus on reduc-
<br />ing the burden of residential
<br />development, using strategies,
<br />such as impact fees and good
<br />development design. Together,
<br />this multi - pronged strategy is
<br />more effective, sustainable and
<br />financially viable than the tradi-
<br />tional "retail only" approach to
<br />land use policy.
<br />Ford Frick, Jim Carpenter
<br />and Tom Pippin collectively
<br />have over 40 years of experience
<br />in land use, market and fiscal
<br />analyses for both public and
<br />private clients. In 2002, BBC
<br />represented clients in over a
<br />dozen states involving issues of
<br />how land use regulation and
<br />growth management strategies
<br />influence the fiscal well being
<br />of local communities.
<br />0 to 25%
<br />-
<br />26 to 50%
<br />-51
<br />to 75%
<br />-
<br />76%+
<br />are beginning to see its flaws.
<br />Retail doesn't stand still. For
<br />example, the primary source of
<br />Boulder's considerable financial
<br />strength, Crossroads Mall, is now
<br />an antiquated and largely shut-
<br />tered facility. The downturn of
<br />Crossroads is largely due to rapid
<br />residential growth along the
<br />Highway 36 corridor and the
<br />accompanying retail competition.
<br />Ultimately, retail will follow
<br />rooftops, and Boulder's long stand-
<br />ing barriers to residential growth
<br />left them vulnerable to retail
<br />migration.
<br />A second complication in the
<br />nity development funds.
<br />In 2002, BBC helped the
<br />City of Indianapolis — which
<br />has a history of struggling with
<br />fair housing issues — identify
<br />barriers to fair housing choice
<br />within the city and its nine
<br />townships.
<br />The study revealed that
<br />racial lines drawn in the past
<br />are difficult to erase. In Indi-
<br />anapolis, as in many cities, the
<br />location where one lived was
<br />once determined as much by
<br />skin color as financial where-
<br />withal and preferences. The
<br />legal boundaries that in the
<br />past mandated where residents
<br />lived in Indianapolis have been
<br />eliminated. But, as shown in
<br />the accompanying graphic,
<br />minorities continue to be con-
<br />centrated in the central city,
<br />while whites have settled in
<br />more suburban areas.
<br />Our study also showed that
<br />the economic growth experi-
<br />enced in the past decade broad-
<br />ened the housing opportunities
<br />of minorities in Indianapolis.
<br />Census data show that the con-
<br />centrations of African- Ameri-
<br />cans living in the central city
<br />declined between 1990 and
<br />2000, while the proportions
<br />living in areas outside of the
<br />central city increased.
<br />However, we found that the
<br />protected classes continue to
<br />face barriers to fair housing
<br />choice in terms of accessing
<br />credit for home mortgages and
<br />home improvement loans.
<br />"all retail strategy" is that retail
<br />developers understand the situ-
<br />ation and know that communi-
<br />ties are willing to subsidize
<br />their presence. As the demand
<br />for retail has increased and as
<br />attractive sites have decreased,
<br />the public side of the typical
<br />"public private partnership"
<br />has grown. It turns out that
<br />developers can run spreadsheets
<br />too, and now it may cost as
<br />much to attract desirable retail-
<br />ers, as communities can receive
<br />in benefits from their presence.
<br />So how should communities
<br />respond? Retail still matters
<br />Origins of New Sales Tax Revenues
<br />And, the study showed that
<br />discriminatory activities related
<br />to housing remain a problem.
<br />The most common reason for
<br />filing complaints about fair
<br />housing discrimination is race.
<br />This is true in Indianapolis, as
<br />well as nationwide.
<br />Finally, one of the largest bar-
<br />riers to fair housing choice iden-
<br />tified in the study was ignorance
<br />— of the law, of one's rights,
<br />and of what to do if discrimina-
<br />tion is experienced.
<br />Cities and states have come a
<br />long way in providing fair hous-
<br />ing opportunities for citizens.
<br />Eliminating fair housing barri-
<br />ers requires solid research to
<br />identify the most serious issues,
<br />a well- crafted plan to address
<br />the top needs, and a continuing
<br />evaluation of progress. BBC will
<br />continue to assist communities
<br />with the very important job of
<br />ensuring fair housing choice for
<br />all residents.
<br />Heidi Aggeler, Jim Carpen-
<br />ter and Tom Pippin direct
<br />BBC's housing practice and
<br />are currently conducting fair
<br />housing studies for Lake
<br />County, Indiana and the cities
<br />of Las Cruces and Las Vegas.
<br />Heidi andJen Garner recently
<br />completed a statewide survey
<br />in Colorado to assess citizens'
<br />knowledge of fair housing law
<br />and measure the types and fre-
<br />quency of housing discrimina-
<br />tion.
<br />because communities cannot col-
<br />lect sales tax without a point of
<br />sale. However, old strategies of
<br />saying no to residential and yes
<br />to retail are shortsighted. Com-
<br />munities must encourage resi-
<br />dential, but in locations and
<br />with designs that minimize ser-
<br />vice costs and allow new resi-
<br />dents to shop locally. Of equal
<br />importance is a focus on reduc-
<br />ing the burden of residential
<br />development, using strategies,
<br />such as impact fees and good
<br />development design. Together,
<br />this multi - pronged strategy is
<br />more effective, sustainable and
<br />financially viable than the tradi-
<br />tional "retail only" approach to
<br />land use policy.
<br />Ford Frick, Jim Carpenter
<br />and Tom Pippin collectively
<br />have over 40 years of experience
<br />in land use, market and fiscal
<br />analyses for both public and
<br />private clients. In 2002, BBC
<br />represented clients in over a
<br />dozen states involving issues of
<br />how land use regulation and
<br />growth management strategies
<br />influence the fiscal well being
<br />of local communities.
<br />
|