My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 11:27:40 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 11:29:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Engineering Analysis and Design of River Facilities including Bed and Bank Modifications and Low Head Dams for River Parks, Salida, Buena Vista and Other Sites in Colorado
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/10/2005
Author
ASCG INCORPORATED
Title
Professional Engineering Problems Recreational In-Channel Diversion (RICD) Application Support
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Map
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ted Kowalski, CWCB <br />Ms. Mgeline Kinnaird, PE Board <br />June 10, 2005 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />The attached ASCG letter report and Power Point presentation are the key documents provided in <br />our review. Also we have provided a copy of Mr. Lacy's report. The lwo sketches enclosed outline <br />improvements, but are not suitable in my opinion to suffice as normal, sealed, design and <br />construction documents. We requested CWCB provide engineering analysis, calculations, pre- <br />and post- constniction surveys and other documents normally provided as part of standard river <br />engineering, floodplain development, and CWCB guidelines. Apparently none are available or are <br />being provided by Recreation Engineering and Planning. <br />In Mr. Lacy's report, justificaGon, analysis, and engineering rely largely on his experience. No <br />apparent surveying and specific analysis of pre-project and proposed design hydraulics and <br />stability using conventional practices has been conducted. Typically, at minimum, water surface <br />profile analysis is conducted using programs such as the Corp's HECR,4S. Further he makes <br />statements about engineering principles and concepts which are misleading andlor wrong. <br />Whitewater hydraulics and river sediment transport and stability analysis is very complicated. <br />Often physical laboratory models are conducted. At minimum, custom calculations to determine <br />three dimensional and special super critical flow situations are conducted. Advanced three <br />dimensional numerical programs are available for this analysis. Essentially nothing significant has <br />been made available, only reference to HECRAS analysis of other projects, which also wasn't <br />provided and is not standard practice for justifying improvements. Of great concem is that no <br />specific analysis has been conducted of the pre-project floodplain conditions, the design, or <br />constructed facilities. In the Salida case, this is onerous because of property and stnictures <br />immediately adjacent to the river. While Mr. Lacy tesGfied that banks were laid back in certain <br />places and holds the position that the dam structures do not cause a rise in flood levels. This is <br />highly unlikely unless significant excavation of the river bed and enlargement of conveyance has <br />been accomplished. There are no signs that this was analyzed or accomplished. In Golden, the <br />same types of Low Head Dams are used, raising the water levels near municipal and private <br />structures. <br />Further, the structures at Salida and Buena Vista have jets diving to the bottom which can create <br />—I� <br />12596 WEST BAYAUD AVENUE, SUITE 200, LAKEWOOD, C080228 <br />303.458.5550 FA%303.480.9756 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.