My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Report for Chaffe County's Buena Vista and Salida Boating Parks
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 11:27:40 AM
Creation date
7/5/2012 11:29:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Engineering Analysis and Design of River Facilities including Bed and Bank Modifications and Low Head Dams for River Parks, Salida, Buena Vista and Other Sites in Colorado
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
6/10/2005
Author
ASCG INCORPORATED
Title
Professional Engineering Problems Recreational In-Channel Diversion (RICD) Application Support
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Map
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ted Kowalski, cwce <br />Ms. Angeline Kinnaird, PE Board <br />June 10, 2005 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />erosion and destabilize the structure, and form wide areas of conventional hydraulic jumps, with <br />"keeping" aciion, a common hazard of low head dams. There are also significant locations where <br />shallow flow drops over the structures, where a boat could be damaged or a boater hurt. Similar <br />structures at other locations, for which CWCB provided photographs show similar problems. We <br />have observed this at the Clear Creek Project in Golden. <br />Another situation of concem is the role of the private attomey for the Chaffee County, whom <br />conducts work for many other communi6es with other RICD applications. It appears that he argues <br />against CWCB engineering reviews, and we wonder if he is directing engineering andlor restricting <br />the infortnation that CWCB receives. <br />We are unaware of the Engineering design contract, and what role the community employees have <br />taken in directing or approving the engineering. <br />This is a troublesome situation, which I believe should be investigated with regard to engineering <br />conduct and public safety issues. There are numerous potential violations of the PE regulations, <br />some of which may include the following or other related items: <br />Not providing adequate engineering including river stability analysis, surveys, and <br />analysis of existing and proposed floodplain conditions. <br />2. Not providing engineering design and construction documents, including drawings and <br />specifications. Not sealing such documents, if they exist. <br />3. Not submitting permit applications for floodplain modifications, including standard <br />engineering analysis and supporting documents. <br />4. Not submitting information, analysis, and design documents per CWCB. <br />5. Not conducting the engineering surveys, analysis and design following standard <br />engineering practice for river hydraulics, river structures, river stabilization, and <br />whitewater facilities. <br />6. Not providing information per standard engineering practice or when requested. <br />7. Justifying conclusions with insu�cient or no apparent engineering analysis, <br />—1� <br />12596 WEST BAYAUD AVENUE, SUITE 200. LAKEWOOD, CO 80228 <br />303.458.5550 FAX 303.480.9766 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.