Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO DROUGHT RESPONSE PLAN - DESCRIPTION <br /> In recent years, Colorado has repeatedly faced serious water shortages. <br /> The droughts of the 1930's and 1950's impacted the State in many ways for <br /> several years. The drought of 1976-77 was not as long in duration but the <br /> consequences were as intense and very costly. Now, in 1981 another drought <br /> has started which may generate costly impacts. <br /> Drought impacts Colorado in many ways, but water intensive activities such <br /> as agriculture, wildfire fighting, municipal usage, commerce, industry, <br /> tourism and wildlife preservation are highly susceptible to drought impact. <br /> The economy of the State or geographic sectors of the State have been and <br /> can be seriously depressed. <br /> Water shortages leading to drought develop because of significant change <br /> in expected conditions bf supply and demand. Since Coloradots population <br /> and water usage in key activities are continuing to grow, demand for water <br /> is rising at a steady rate. Available supplies have also increased over <br /> the years through a variety of structural (dams) and non-structural (cloud <br /> seeding, conservation) means, but the State's ability to create new levels <br /> of supply is marginal . In recent years, demands have been increasing faster <br /> than supplies, so that the tolerance to deal with water shortages is diminish- <br /> ing. As climate and conservation practice fluctuate, the balance between <br /> supply and demand is likely to be disrupted more and more frequently. In <br /> the future, droughts are likely to be more frequent and costly. <br /> BACKGROUND OF DROUGHT RESPONSE PLANNING IN COLORADO. The drought of the <br /> 1930's was exacerbated by poor farming techniques, low market prices and <br /> a depressed economy. impacts on the State and across much of the Great <br /> Plains were severe; population migration away from farming was an important <br /> consequence. A variety of adjustments ensued: improved agricultural manage- <br /> ment, the establishment of insurance programs, liberalization of credit, and <br /> diversification of the regional economy. These adjustments moderated the <br /> drought in the early 1950's; impacts were much less severe although clima, <br /> tological conditions were not that different from those of the dust bowl era. <br /> Conclusions From Past Drought Efforts. In the 1976-77 drought, Colorado <br /> State government assumed a lead role in activating Federal and local <br /> governments as well as statewide public conservation practices. In the <br /> process of making these adjustments it was apparent that timely and <br /> accurate provisions of data on impact development was crucial to effective <br /> response. The diversity, complexity, and abiguity of drought impacts <br /> blurred identification of the alternative actions available to decision <br /> makers. Both physical and social impact data were needed; that is, know- <br /> ledge about the location, kind and degree of water shortage can lead to <br /> better identification of the kinds of impacts on society that can follow.. <br /> In turn, these societal impacts provide the framework for the governmental <br /> and public adjustments that may be required, Furthermore, a systematic <br /> development of problem areas and potential solutions was obviously essential <br /> to effective and frugal government response, so that "under" and "over'" <br /> reactions could be minimized. Other important conclusions stressed the <br /> need 4nd the importance of: (1) the careful integration of response, <br /> i .e. , private, public and governmental , and (2) the maintenance of <br /> established channels of responsibility as drought intensifies. Finally, <br /> A-1 <br />