My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981 CO Drought Plan
CWCB
>
Drought Mitigation
>
DayForward
>
1981 CO Drought Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2012 4:33:36 PM
Creation date
4/9/2012 2:29:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Drought Mitigation
Title
The Colorado Drought Response Plan
Date
5/15/1981
Description
Colorado Drought Response Plan
Basin
Statewide
Drought Mitigation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
Document Relationships
2007UpdateCODroughtMitiation&ResponsePlan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
2010 Colorado Drought Mitigation & Response Plan
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
2013CODroughtMitigation&ResponsePlan
(Message)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
ColoradoDroughtResponsePlan(2002)
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Gov Lamm Memo 11Feb1981 - Drought Mngmt Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
Gov Lamm Memo Jan 1981 - Drought Prep
(Attachment)
Path:
\Drought Mitigation\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COLORADO DROUGHT RESPONSE PLAN - DESCRIPTION <br /> In recent years, Colorado has repeatedly faced serious water shortages. <br /> The droughts of the 1930's and 1950's impacted the State in many ways for <br /> several years. The drought of 1976-77 was not as long in duration but the <br /> consequences were as intense and very costly. Now, in 1981 another drought <br /> has started which may generate costly impacts. <br /> Drought impacts Colorado in many ways, but water intensive activities such <br /> as agriculture, wildfire fighting, municipal usage, commerce, industry, <br /> tourism and wildlife preservation are highly susceptible to drought impact. <br /> The economy of the State or geographic sectors of the State have been and <br /> can be seriously depressed. <br /> Water shortages leading to drought develop because of significant change <br /> in expected conditions bf supply and demand. Since Coloradots population <br /> and water usage in key activities are continuing to grow, demand for water <br /> is rising at a steady rate. Available supplies have also increased over <br /> the years through a variety of structural (dams) and non-structural (cloud <br /> seeding, conservation) means, but the State's ability to create new levels <br /> of supply is marginal . In recent years, demands have been increasing faster <br /> than supplies, so that the tolerance to deal with water shortages is diminish- <br /> ing. As climate and conservation practice fluctuate, the balance between <br /> supply and demand is likely to be disrupted more and more frequently. In <br /> the future, droughts are likely to be more frequent and costly. <br /> BACKGROUND OF DROUGHT RESPONSE PLANNING IN COLORADO. The drought of the <br /> 1930's was exacerbated by poor farming techniques, low market prices and <br /> a depressed economy. impacts on the State and across much of the Great <br /> Plains were severe; population migration away from farming was an important <br /> consequence. A variety of adjustments ensued: improved agricultural manage- <br /> ment, the establishment of insurance programs, liberalization of credit, and <br /> diversification of the regional economy. These adjustments moderated the <br /> drought in the early 1950's; impacts were much less severe although clima, <br /> tological conditions were not that different from those of the dust bowl era. <br /> Conclusions From Past Drought Efforts. In the 1976-77 drought, Colorado <br /> State government assumed a lead role in activating Federal and local <br /> governments as well as statewide public conservation practices. In the <br /> process of making these adjustments it was apparent that timely and <br /> accurate provisions of data on impact development was crucial to effective <br /> response. The diversity, complexity, and abiguity of drought impacts <br /> blurred identification of the alternative actions available to decision <br /> makers. Both physical and social impact data were needed; that is, know- <br /> ledge about the location, kind and degree of water shortage can lead to <br /> better identification of the kinds of impacts on society that can follow.. <br /> In turn, these societal impacts provide the framework for the governmental <br /> and public adjustments that may be required, Furthermore, a systematic <br /> development of problem areas and potential solutions was obviously essential <br /> to effective and frugal government response, so that "under" and "over'" <br /> reactions could be minimized. Other important conclusions stressed the <br /> need 4nd the importance of: (1) the careful integration of response, <br /> i .e. , private, public and governmental , and (2) the maintenance of <br /> established channels of responsibility as drought intensifies. Finally, <br /> A-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.