Laserfiche WebLink
recreation experience in and on the water, it does not satisfy <br />the beneficial use requirement, and the application cannot be <br />granted. The more difficult issue, however, is determining <br />exactly what the General Assembly meant by its RICD definition <br />and in particular, the phrases "minimum stream flow" "for a <br />reasonable recreation experience in and on the water." <br />Within the context of the RICD statutory definition, we <br />address first the phrase "minimum stream flow," construing it <br />literally according to common usage. See, e.g. Yascavage 101 <br />P.3d at 1093. Comporting with common usage, Black's defines <br />"minimum" as "[o]f, relating to, or constituting the smallest <br />acceptable or possible quantity in a given case." Bryan A. <br />Garner, ed., Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed. 1999). <br />Accordingly, as used in the RICD definition, minimum stream flow <br />means the least necessary stream flow to accomplish a given <br />reasonable recreation experience in and on the water. <br />The latter phrase in the RICD definition, "reasonable <br />recreation experience <br />common usage of which <br />the reasonableness of <br />whitewater kayaking m; <br />A casual kayaker, for <br />moderate flows, while <br />in and on the water," does not have a <br />this Court has been made aware. Indeed, <br />a given recreation experience such as <br />ay vary by the appropriator's perspective. <br />example, may be satisfied with low to <br />an expert probably demands higher stream <br />32 <br />