My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2010 3:41:20 PM
Creation date
6/23/2010 1:06:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
South Platte Steering Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/6/1961
Author
South Platte Steering Committee
Title
South Platte Steering Committee Meeting Minutes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
costs, assuming that the benefits would be equal <br />or equivalent at the two sites. I can see from <br />the discussion that probably what you want is an <br />addendum or an expansion of this site selection <br />report to cover some of the hydrology features <br />and that is going to take us a little time. Just <br />how much time I'm not prepared to state at this <br />time. <br />There is one thing I wish you could conclude <br />out of this site selection report and that is <br />whether we should continue to consider the con- <br />trol of Bijou Creek at Hoyt. At least we might <br />get one thing out of the woods." <br />MR. GILDERSLEEVE: "Well, Joe, it seems to me that there have <br />been two major questions which have been asked <br />this morning by the members of the steering com- <br />mittee. One has to do with the exchange possi- <br />bilities at Narrows and Weld County and the other <br />has to do with the service possibilities as be- <br />tween the two reservoirs. Now I'm sure, with <br />respect to the first, that the Bureau would con- <br />sult with people like Mr. Osborne and other members <br />of the committee and the people in the State Engi- <br />neer's office who have run the river for a number <br />of years. I don't think it would take very long <br />to determine whether there are exchange possi- <br />bilities of any great extent without an upstream <br />reservoir such as Two Forks. That would be one <br />thing that would be settled. I don't think it <br />would take too long with the help of the members <br />of the committee to find out which areas need <br />water, which ditches need water and which ones <br />would be likely to ask for it. <br />Now those two things, I think, would help <br />very much in clearing up the thoughts of some of <br />the members of the steering committee. I can't <br />conceive that those studies wouldn't have to be <br />made in any event and why they would extend the <br />time limit so much on your report." <br />MR. BARRETT: "We've been working for a little over six <br />months just trying to get a picture of what is <br />going on, on the South Platte River and we <br />haven't got that clarified yet. There is a <br />-41- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.