Laserfiche WebLink
GUNNISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Page 11 of 17 <br />and the applicant in order for the applicant and subsequent homeowners within this subdivision to <br />remove water from the City of Gunnison ditch for irrigation. Such agreement is required to be <br />submitted in the Final Plan. <br />7. The City of Gunnison has indicated that no fences, sheds or other structures are allowed to be <br />located within the easement along the City's ditch, and has requested that language be included in <br />the protective covenants stating that restriction. The Board finds inclusion of that language to be in <br />the interest of the public health, safety and welfare. <br />8. The City of Gunnison has verbally requested, and the applicant has verbally agreed, to allow the <br />City to construct a gate on the walkway across the subject property to the City's diversion structure. <br />g. There exist easement disputes with William Chandler and with Richard and Phyllis Guerrieri that <br />have not yet been resolved. The County Attorney's position on such civil matters has been that the <br />Land Use Change Permit Process shall not "be held hostage" to reaching such resolution. However, <br />there is no clear evidence as to whether lot lines and dimensions and /or numbers of lots would <br />require realignment, depending upon resolution of the disagreement, and such resolution may <br />require replat of at least a portion of the current plan. Such discrepancy shall be required to be <br />indicated on the Final Plat. <br />1o. The easement for the City of Gunnison's irrigation ditch, and its required setbacks are required to <br />be shown on the Final Plat. <br />11. County Attorney David Baumgarten has provided the opinion that, "... [O]ne can affirmatively <br />include in the calculation of lot size that portion of the lot used exclusively for a private road. In <br />order to take advantage of this calculation, the plats, covenants and deeds must clearly identify the <br />location and dimensions of the private road, limit the use of the road to private road use by <br />landowners, guests and invitees and utilities, prohibit construction and use of non -road <br />improvements in the road, and provide for reciprocal use of the road by other lot owners." Those <br />identifications are reasonably required to be included within the covenants and plats submitted as <br />part of the Final Plan, and within deed language conveying individual lots. <br />12. The applicant has indicated that the name of this development will be changed from "Cottonwood <br />Park" to "North Cottonwood Park," to avoid duplication of the name of an existing manufactured <br />home park in the County. The title of "North Cottonwood Park" will therefore be the correct <br />reference for the Final Plan of this development. <br />13. Neighbors to the property, both immediately adjacent, and across the river channel, have expressed <br />concern about the fragility of the "island" portion of this property, and about the safety of children <br />who may attempt to cross water to play on it. The applicant has, during this review, removed the <br />"island" as part of the recreational open space. Language is to be added to the Protective Covenants <br />indicating that the "island" is not to be used by park residents. <br />14. The recommendations by the Colorado State Forest Service for maintenance of lawns and common <br />ground areas, stacking of fire wood, and inclusion of signs identifying lot owner and address are in <br />the best interest of public health, safety and welfare, and language identifying that provision and <br />maintenance of those elements are a responsibility to be overseen by the homeowners' association is <br />therefore required to be included within the Final Plan submittal of the protective covenants. <br />15. Significant vegetation currently exists along the Guerrieri irrigation ditch, shielding adjacent <br />landowners, the Carl Reinmans, from the subject property, and therefore providing some mitigation <br />of visual and noise impacts to the Reinmans from proposed development activity. If for any reason <br />the vegetation is significantly decreased, the vegetative buffer is required to be replaced; the width <br />of that buffer, and the specific kinds of vegetation (heights and types of trees and bushes) within it <br />are required to be included within the final landscaping plan, and the width of the buffer shown on <br />the Final Plat. <br />16. Section 5 -305: D.5.a.1. of the Revised Land Use Resolution requires that when landscaping is <br />included, an estimated related demand for water, based upon information required by the Natural <br />Resources Conservation Service. The final version of that document is required to include <br />http : / /www.co.gunnison.co.us/BOCC /minutes /20030304mn.html 6/6/2003 <br />