My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
House Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
House Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2010 9:03:21 AM
Creation date
6/2/2010 11:18:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
SB01-216
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/7/2001
Title
House Committee on Agriculture, Livestock, & Natural Resources
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Clerk: Rippy? <br /> Rep. Rippy: No. <br /> Clerk: Snook? <br /> Rep. Snook: No. <br /> Clerk: Tochtrop? <br /> Rep. Tochtrop: No. <br /> Clerk: Webster? <br /> Rep. Webster: No. <br /> Clerk: Hoppe? <br /> • <br /> Rep..Hoppe: No. <br /> : 1erk: Madam Chair? <br /> Mme. Chair: No. <br /> Clerk: [unintelligible] fails by a two to nine vote. <br /> Woman: Representative Bradley, with respect to the bill [unintelligible] <br /> further amendments. <br /> Woman: Good bill. Vote yes. <br /> Mme. Chair: The appropriate motion is to Appropriations Committee. <br /> Representative Rippy? <br /> Rep. Rippy: Madam Chair, I would move Senate Bill 216 to the Appropriations <br /> Committee. <br /> Mme.. Chair: Seconded by Webster. Representative Plant? <br /> Rep. Plant: Thanks. I just want to point out a couple of things, not that I think <br /> it's going to make any difference, but I think —and my name's on <br /> this Bill —I think this is a good idea, but I've got to tell you, because <br /> I do think that there is an issue that needs to be addressed here, and <br /> it's a very valid issue. But I think that we are making a significant <br /> change here. I don't think that there has been enough study and <br /> May 7, 2001 <br /> Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.