My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9718
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9718
Author
Strand, A.
Title
Analysis of a preliminary microsatellite dataset for wild and captive populations of humpback chub, Gila cypha.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />0 <br />- o <br />m <br />r_ <br />N <br />O <br />C <br />0 <br />U O <br />O <br />N <br />O <br />It <br />O <br />(Q <br />O <br />N <br />O <br />Number of diploid individuals sampled <br />This figure indicates that 29 diploid individuals are sufficient to detect an allele present at <br />a frequency of 0.05 at least 95% of the time. If the allele is present at 0.1, only 15 individuals <br />need to be sampled. <br />It is likely that at least one copy of each allele that exists at frequencies greater than <br />0.1 will be detected at Salt Camp and Coyote Camp. An important caveat to note is that <br />the frequencies of alleles in these samples may differ significantly from the actual population <br />frequencies, though at least alleles are represented in the sample. The sample from Boulders <br />is considerably smaller and may not represent adequately the diversity of the alleles at that <br />site. Table 3 gives the number of fish genotyped from each site. <br />3 Analyses of empirical data <br />The analyses for this study can be divided into those that assess the quality of the data <br />available (section 3.1), the genetic behavior of the loci employed (sections 3.4 and 3.5), and <br />the biological question of how is marker-genetic variation apportioned in captive and wild <br />Humpback chub populations (sections 3.7 and 3.8). <br />2 <br />0 10 20 30 40 50 60
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.