My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9718
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:58 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 5:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9718
Author
Strand, A.
Title
Analysis of a preliminary microsatellite dataset for wild and captive populations of humpback chub, Gila cypha.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />1 Introduction <br />The objective of this report is to assess the quality of the preliminary genetic data available for <br />Gila cypha and, if possible, use these data to answer two questions regarding the broodstock <br />fish held at Willow Beach. If the data quality are sufficient, I should be able to determine if <br />the Willow Beach broodstock adequately represent the genetic variation present in the Little <br />Colorado River. Depending on the answer to this question, I will make recommendations on <br />how the utility of this broodstock can best be enhanced. <br />I will first use a simple power analysis to evaluate whether the three wild collected <br />samples adequately represent the genetic variation in these populations. I will then compare <br />populations sampled in the wild to the captive population to determine how much of the <br />variation in the wild is present in the captive population. <br />It is important to note that these analyses focus on neutral markers and not on the <br />quantitative traits that are much more likely to influence performance in the wild. <br />2 Theoretical analysis: Proportion of variation collected <br />in field <br />To satisfy the objectives listed above, it is important to adequately characterize variation in <br />both wild and broodstock populations. Characterizing variation in the broodstock is rela- <br />tively straightforward: all (or a majority of the) fish in the broodstock should be genotyped. <br />Characterizing variation in the wild is more problematic, because any inference will always <br />be based upon samples rather than all the fish in a drainage. As a result, it is important to <br />determine how large a sample is necessary to develop a wild reference to which to compare <br />broodstock. <br />This section is essentially a power analysis that attempts to determine a sample's ability <br />to represent genetic variation present in natural populations. In this analysis, I focus on rare <br />alleles and contrast them against all of the more common alleles present. This focus allows <br />the use of the binomial distribution to model power. In the analysis below I assume a diploid <br />locus in a population that is randomly mating. <br />The figure below gives the results of this analysis. The solid line refers to the probability <br />of detecting an allele at a frequency of 0.05. The dashed line refers to the probability of <br />detecting an allele at a frequency of 0.1.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.