My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8012
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:45:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8012
Author
Grand Canyon Trust.
Title
Colorado River Workshop, issues, ideas, and directions (February 26-28, 1996 Phoenix, Arizona) An open forum for discussion of management issues between managers, water users, and stakeholders of the Colorado River basin.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
1996.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />ENDANGERED SPECIES <br /> <br />NATIVE FISH RECOVERY EFFORTS <br /> <br />Authors <br />Robert Wigington & Dale Pontius <br />The Nature Conservancy <br /> <br />Panelists <br /> <br />George Arthur, Navajo Nation <br />Dan Luecke, Environmental Defense Fund <br />Chris Harris, AZ Department of Water Resources <br /> <br />OBSERVATIONS <br /> <br />The following observations serve as a general summary provided by the conference conveners and do not represent any <br />"consensus" of the workshop participants. The full (verbatim) notes from each breakout session are provided in this <br />report following the text of each discussion paper. <br /> <br />This session focused on the implementation of the fed- <br />eral Endangered Species Act, a powerful tool aimed at <br />protecting species from extinction. The paper prepar- <br />ers, Robert Wigington and Dale Pontius, presented a <br />comparison of native fish recovery efforts in three parts <br />of the Colorado River basin, and used these examples <br />to critique the effectiveness of endangered species pro- <br />tection. A panel of speakers from tribal, state, and <br />environmental advocacy perspectives then responded <br /> <br />to the paper, providing their own ideas for improve- <br />ment of the program. <br /> <br />After the panel discussion, participants broke into <br />three groups to consider these suggestions and to eval- <br />uate the federal endangered species program based on <br />their experiences. The groups began by listing the areas <br />in which endangered species protection is working, <br />pointing out, for example, that we now have more <br /> <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.