Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />SCOPE OF WORK <br /> <br />The scope of work for this investigation was based <br />on a sampling program that provided an <br />understanding of the life history and ecology of the <br />humpback chub and simultaneously addressed <br />hypotheses on effects of Glen Canyon Dam <br />operations. The nature of the study objectives <br />required an integrated approach to link humpback <br />chub life history requirements with physical, <br />chemical, and biological components of the <br />environment that are potentially affected by dam <br />operations. A compr~hensive understanding of life <br />history requirements was required to evaluate. <br />limiting factors. <br /> <br />Although the humpback chub was described in 1945 <br />(Miller 1946) and periodically studied since the late <br />1960s, only general life history information and <br />schedules are known. While the population in <br />Grand Canyon is the most intensively studied, the <br />focus of investigations has been on the LCR rather <br />than on the mainstem Colorado River. The lack of <br />information on the humpback chub required parallel <br />and sometimes simultaneous assimilation of life <br />history information and hypothesis development and <br /> <br />Existing Life <br />History <br />Information <br />of Humpback <br />Chub <br /> <br />Ongoing <br />Study <br /> <br />Accumulated <br />Information <br />and <br />Data <br /> <br /> <br />Evaluate Effects <br />of Dam Operation <br /> <br /><H: <br />H2 <br />o <br /> <br />Introduction . 1-5 <br /> <br />testing (Fig. 1-3). Limiting factors were identified <br />and explained through a process of life history <br />descriptions leading to multiple sequential <br />hypotheses and multiple parallel hypotheses <br />(Schumm 1991). Hypotheses were developed as <br />ideas or propositions to provide ~ foundation for <br />explaining certain phenomena. This approach was <br />used to focus the study design on an evaluation of <br />effects with a dedicated data collection protocol. <br /> <br />Flow characteristics of the Colorado River in Grand <br />Canyon varied during this investigation and have <br />varied dramatically since Glen Canyon Dam began <br />impounding water on March 13, 1963 (See Chapter <br />3 - HYDROLOGY). Hence, the scope of work for <br />this investigation focused on operational <br />components (i.e., magnitude of fluctuations, <br />minimum and maximum discharges, and rates of <br />change in fluctuating discharges) rather than <br />operational regimes because of the varied flow <br />characteristics. Operational regimes during this <br />investigation included "research flows" (June 1, <br />1990 through July 29, 1991) and "interim flows" <br />(August 1, 1991 through completion of this field <br />investigation). The short duration of each of these <br />flow scenarios precluded identifying, isolating, and <br /> <br />Data <br />Integration <br /> <br />Present <br />Understanding <br />of Life <br />History of <br />Humpback <br />Chub <br /> <br />Sequential <br />and Parallel <br />Hypotheses <br />Development <br />H3 <br />o <br />H4 <br />HOs <br />o <br />H6 <br />o <br />H' <br />o <br /> <br />Final <br />Hypotheses <br />Testing <br /> <br />Reject <br />Accept <br />Reject <br />Accept <br />Reject <br /> <br />Fig. 1-3. Relationship of assimilation of life history information and hypothesis development and testing. <br />