Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1-6 . Chapter 1 <br /> <br />tracking important physical, chemical, and <br />biological variables and measures of biological <br />responses. <br /> <br />Changes in operational regimes during this study <br />limited opportunities for inducing and observing <br />long-term biological responses. Rigorous testing of <br />hypotheses was not possible, because the system <br />under investigation was not experimentally <br />manipulated for ichthyofaunal responses, and <br />replicate systems were not identified and <br />simultaneously studied. Cause-effect relationships <br />were first identified through systematic sampling, <br />and hypotheses were developed from inferences of <br />these relationships. These hypotheses provided <br />valuable insight into ecological limitations of <br />humpback chub and helped to identify mechanisms <br />and causes of effects from dam operations. <br /> <br />Inferences that identified possible effects of dam <br />operations on humpback chub were based on <br />literature and available data collected from this and <br />other investigations. Few inferences were made for <br />operational effects on other trophic levels, because <br />data collected in parallel studies by other researchers <br />were preliminary and largely unavailable. <br />Integration with tributary studies, particularly in the <br />LCR, was also minimal, since information from <br />these investigations was not available. <br /> <br />Selected physical, chemical, and biological <br />components were described and quantified, where <br />possible, to provide an integrated understanding of <br />those elements of the ecosystem that most likely <br />affect and limit humpback chub in Grand Canyon. <br />Data were systematically collected in this study, or <br />in cooperation with other studies, to minimize <br />overlap with other research efforts and provide a <br />comprehensive database to GCES for development <br />of an integrated report. <br /> <br />STUDY AREA <br /> <br />The Colorado River through Grand Canyon flows <br />for about 470 kIn (293 mi) from Glen Canyon Dam <br />to the Lake Mead Inflow at Grand Wash Cliffs <br />(Fig.I-4, Table 1-2). The river in this area is <br />controlled entirely by Glen Canyon Dam, except for <br />periodic floods from tributaries that otherwise <br />insignificantly affect flow volume. The study area <br />began at Lees Ferry (RM 0.0), 25.4 kIn (15.8 mi) <br />do\\nstream of the dam and extended 364 kIn (226 <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />mi) to Diamond Creek (RM 226.0). For the <br />purposes of this report, the area between Glen <br />Canyon Dam and Grand Wash Cliffs (RM 277.0) is <br />referred to as the Grand Canyon. This area includes <br />the lower 25.8 kIn of Glen Canyon (dam to Paria <br />River), 97.2 kIn of Marble Canyon (Paria River to <br />LCR), and 347.0 kIn of Grand Canyon (LCR to <br />Grand Wash Cliffs). <br /> <br />This study area was divided into four study regions <br />to partition sampling effort by major longitudinal <br />areas. The four regions were further divided into II <br />geomorphic reaches (Schmidt and Graf 1990) as <br />sampling units (See Chapter 2 - STUDY DESIGN). <br />The four study regions included: (I) Region O--Lees <br />Ferry to Kwagunt Rapid, (2) Region I--Kwagunt <br />Rapid to Hance Rapid, (3) Region ll--Hance Rapid <br />to below Havasu Creek, and (4) Region ill --below <br />Havasu Creek to Diamond Creek. Regions I, n, and <br />III were sampled from October 1990 through <br />November 1993. Region 0 was added to extend the <br />investigation upstream in January 1993. A fifth <br />region--Region IV (Diamond Creek, RM 226.0, to <br />Pearce Ferry, RM 280.0)--was investigated as part <br />of an aquatic resources study for the Hualapai <br />Indian Tribe and GCES (Valdez 1993, 1994, 1995). <br /> <br />Reference landmarks along the river corridor were <br />located to the nearest tenth (0.1) of a river mile (i.e., <br />distance downstream from Lees Ferry along the <br />center of the river) according to Belknap and Evans <br />(1989), and sample sites were entered in the <br />database to the nearest twentieth (0.05) of a river <br />mile. It should be noted that Lees Ferry is 15.8 river <br />miles downstream of Glen Canyon Dam, and river <br />miles cited in this report are in reference to Lees <br />Ferry and not Glen Canyon Dam, unless otherwise <br />specified. A list of sites commonly referenced in <br />this report is provided in Table 1-2 with river miles, <br />river kilometers, and miles and kilometers <br />downstream from Glen Canyon Dam. The <br />following is a description of the four study regions <br />(O-II1). This description and Fig. 1-5 are provided <br />to farn.iliarize the reader with the physical character <br />and lithology of the study area, and to develop a <br />foundation for later discussion of fish habitat <br />availability and use. (See Chapter 7 - HABITAT). <br />Detailed descriptions of Grand Canyon geology <br />were presented by Hamblin and Rigby (1968, 1969) <br />and Howard and Dolan (1981). <br />