My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7908
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:57 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:22:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7908
Author
Valdez, R. A. and R. J. Ryel.
Title
Life History and Ecology of the Humpback Chub (
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1-4 . Chapter 1 <br /> <br />Conservation Measure 5: Conduct research to <br />identify impacts of Glen Canyon Dam operations on <br />the humpback chub in the mainstem and tributaries. <br /> <br />Conservation Measure 6: Establish a long-term <br />monitoring program to assess the relationship of <br />project operations to the humpback chub. <br /> <br />Conservation Measure 7: Establish a second <br />spawning population of humpback chub in the <br />Grand Canyon. <br /> <br />Conservation measures 5 and 7 provided the <br />framework for the purpose and objectives of the <br />BIW investigation, as detailed in the following <br />section. These measures also guided study designs <br />of other investigations as part of the Phase II DIRP. <br /> <br />On July 27, 1989 Secretary of Interior, Manuel <br />Lujan, directed the initiation of an Environmental <br />Impact Statement (EIS) on the Operation of Glen <br />Canyon Dam. Passage of the Grand Canyon <br />Protection Act of 1992 (PL 102-575) on October <br />30, 1992 mandated completion of a Final EIS no <br />later than 2 years after the date of enactment (Sec. <br />1804). Most of the NEF Studies identified in Fig. <br />1-2 were not completed in time for the Draft EIS, <br />and only preliminary findings and results were <br />provided from this BIW investigation to the EIS <br />Team. <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The purpose of this investigation, as stated in <br />Reclamation Contract No. 0-CS-40-0911O to BIW <br />, <br />was to: <br /> <br />"Evaluate the ecological and limiting factors of all <br />life stages of humpback chub in the mainstem <br />Colorado River, Grand Canyon, and the effects of <br />Glen Canyon Dam operations. " <br /> <br />This investigation was designed to describe <br />physical, chemical, and biological components of <br />the Grand Canyon aquatic ecosystem and to identify <br />principal factors limiting the survival and <br />proliferation of the endangered humpback chub. <br />This investigation addressed only certain aspects of <br />these components and was designed to share roles <br />and responsibilities with other investigations, as <br />outlined in Table 1-1. <br /> <br />Final Report <br /> <br />The study objectives for BIW were to determine the <br />following attributes for humpback chub in the <br />mainstem Colorado River in Grand Canyon: <br /> <br />~ Distribution, abundance and movement. <br />~ Survivorship of early life stages. <br />~ Reproductive capacity and success. <br />~ Resource availability and use (i.e., habitat, <br />food). <br />~ Important biotic interactions with other species <br />for all life stages. <br />~ The life history schedule. <br /> <br />These objectives were developed by Reclamation as <br />part of the NEF Studies to address Conservation <br />Measures 5 and 7 and to provide insight into <br />Question 6 and Hypotheses Ho-6.1, Ho-6.1a, and <br />Ho-6.1b of the Phase II DIRP (Volume 1, pages <br />10-11). Question 6 and the associated DIRP <br />hypotheses are addressed in Chapter 10 - <br />INTEGRA nON of this report. <br /> <br />Question 6: "How do discharge fluctuations and <br />rates of change in fluctuating discharges affect other <br />fish, especially native fish species? Do the USFWS <br />(Service) Conservation Measures adequately <br />address this question?" <br /> <br />Ho-6.1: "There is no significant relationship <br />between the population dynamics (including short- <br />term abundance of early life stages and potential <br />predation relationships) of native (especially the <br />humpback chub) and introduced fish species in the <br />mainstem Colorado, including mainstem backwaters <br />and the confluence of the Little Colorado, and the <br />magnitude of fluctuations, minimum discharges and <br />rates of change of fluctuating discharges." <br /> <br />Ho-6.1a: "There is no significant relationship <br />between population dynamics of native and <br />introduced fish species in the mainstem Colorado, <br />including backwaters and tributaries, and the <br />magnitude of discharge fluctuations." <br /> <br />Ho-6.1 b: "There is no significant relationship <br />between population dynamics of native and <br />introduced fish species in the mainstem Colorado, <br />including back'Waters and tributaries, and the <br />magnitude of minimum discharges." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.