My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7781
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7781
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:32:56 AM
Creation date
8/10/2009 4:03:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7781
Author
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Recovery Plan for WOUNDFIN,
USFW Year
1979.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The plans should be detailed enough to recommend specific manage- <br />ment practices to the agency involved. Preparation of the plans <br />should begin as soon as potential transplant sites are approved <br />and should be finished prior to actual transplanting of the fish. <br />Initially, the Team recommends plans be developed for the two <br />sites suggested in 2.11 (upper Gila and upper Verde rivers). Costs <br />are estimated at $5,000 per plan. -The Team recommends the U. S. <br />Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management be the lead agencies <br />in drafting these plans. <br />(2.2) Collect and transplant into former habitat. <br />As soon as suitable habitat has been selected, habitat management <br />plans written and enhancement features added if necessary, woundfin <br />can be transplanted. State agencies should plan on leading the <br />transplant operation by providing fish transport trucks and <br />adequate personnel. Woundfin have been transported before and <br />offer no special problems. Woundfin for the transplant should <br />be gathered in the early spring (March-April), prior to initiation <br />of spawning. This time period is also before the irrigation <br />season, and fish commonly congregate below the irrigation diversions <br />for the Washington-St. George Canal Company (Utah) and the Mesquite <br />irrigation diversion (Nevada). The Team recommends transplant <br />stock be taken from these congregations as most of these woundfin <br />will be stranded and die if left in place during the course of <br />the year as irrigation practices divert all of the water from <br />the river channel at these localities. A suggested amount of <br />$1000 should be allotted for each transplant attempt. <br />(2.3) Monitor transplanted populations. <br />After the fish have been transplanted, each population should be <br />monitored in order to determine their success. Monitoring proce- <br />dures are discussed in (1.1) and the Appendix. The Team recommends <br />this monitoring schedule be continued until the species is delisted <br />and suggests the individual states assume the monitoring responsibility. <br />The cost will be approximately $3,500 per year per locality. <br />(2.4) Manage all restored woundfin habitat and populations (2.41-2.43). <br />See discussion under 1.3 through 1.33. <br />(3.0) Information and education. <br />To inform the public of the recovery effort and <br />oration about the woundfin, the Team recommends <br />on information and education material. <br />to give them infor- <br />that funds be expended <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.