Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TASK A: DATABASE ASSIMILATION <br /> <br />TASK Oanx:rlVES <br /> <br />The ~ of Task A was to assimilate the datamse, and SUJIIllat'ize and <br />document the canponent data sets. The specific objectives of Task A were to: <br /> <br />1. Assimilate the data provided by FWS. <br /> <br />2. Develop a concise sumnary of each data set, including study documen- <br />tation. <br /> <br />3. Provide SUI1I1Iary tables of the endangered fish and associated habitat <br />information fram the assimilated data. <br /> <br />4. Locate and summarize available documentation for 51 curves that have <br />been developed in previous studies. <br /> <br />Objective 1: Database Assimilation <br /> <br />Methods. The data "-Ere received by BIO/~ primarily from the FWS in <br />about 40 canJ;11terized source files. These files were in a variety of formats, <br />containing over 100,000 records or lines of information. Data representing <br />1964-1984 were received fran FWS in a database previously assimilated by the <br />COlorado Water Congress called ~/DATABASE (Valdez and Ryel 1984). The files <br />in this database "-Ere in a ccmnon format that made it easy to access, retrieve, <br />and store records. For the period 1979-1986, data used "-Ere those received <br />directly fram FWS instea:i of that stored in C~/DATABASE, because of possible <br />updates by that agency. Therefore, data prior to 1979 were taken trom CJiJC/DA- <br />TABASE, and the rest "-Ere secured directly from FWS. <br /> <br />When the data were received by B10/WEST, they W':!re checked for consistency <br />of fieldnames and codes, and related to a documented study. Most of the data <br />W':!re provided in dBASE III+ format. The data W':!re then entered into a single <br />database with a camlOl1 format, called FWS/DATABASE. This database was then <br />reduced to a working database of alxmt 8,000 records containing depth, velo- <br />ci ty , or substrate rneasuranents on the three target fish. Data discrepancies <br />and errors were identified and corrected, and the collectors of the data W':!re <br />contacted, whenever possible. <br /> <br />Results. The datamse is defined as all of the available data collected <br />in the upper COlorado River Basin that either qualitatively or quantitatively <br />describe thehabi tat used by the COlorado squawfish, hump1:ack chub, and <br />razortack sucker. The data assimilated by BIO/~ for this project spans a <br />period of 23 years, fran 1964 through 1986, and includes the collections of 17 <br />principal investigators. <br /> <br />Data provided by FWS included collections by that agency, Bureau of <br />Reclamation, COlorado Division of Wildlife, Utah Division of Wildlife Resour- <br /> <br />3 <br />