Laserfiche WebLink
decreased since 1979 (Table 26), but only slightly. There is no hard evidence <br />to show the quantity or quality of the lake trout fishery has deteriorated. <br />Most likely, the fishery and harvest is stabilizing. However, due to the <br />vulnerability of the lake trout, the fishery should be closely monitored to pre- <br />vent overharvest and reduced quality. <br />Smallmouth bass harvests are still relatively low, but have increased over <br />the years to a high of 1,780 fish in 1982 (Table 20). Smallmouth bass can be <br />found from the lower Open Hills (Pipeline) south to the dam. Average lengths <br />and weights from harvested smallmouth bass have remained about the same <br />throughout the project period (Table 26). In 1982, smallmouth bass averaged 9.4 <br />inches in length and 0.5 pounds in weight. Bass fishing can be very good during <br />the pre-spawn and spawning periods of late May and June, but few anglers appear <br />interested in the fishery. Some interest has been generated by bass clubs from <br />Salt Lake City, Utah which have held bass tournaments yearly since 1979. The <br />potential for an increased bass fishery exists. <br />Creel surveys have been an integral part of the fishery management work done <br />on Flaming Gorge since 1963. Creel survey techniques have changed through the <br />years, yielding better estimates of pressure, harvest, catch rates, species com- <br />position of the harvest and other biological data. The need to follow fish <br />populations, such as the lake trout, kokanee, brown trout and different strains <br />of rainbow trout requires that accurate trend data be collected yearly which can <br />be compared to data from previous years. Full intensity creel surveys (aerial <br />and angler interviews) need to be done at 5 year intervals. Shifts in fishing <br />pressure from one area of the reservoir to the next can give estimates which are <br />wrong and misleading. A good example of this was the shift in fishing pressure, <br />especially for lake trout, from the Canyon to the Open Hills Area in 1981. <br />During the intervening years, only angler interview surveys will be needed. <br />The intensity of these intervening years surveys needs some discussion. Based <br />on the 1982 full intensity survey, it was established that the 6 month survey <br />(April-September), was not identifying enough of the harvest to make good <br />estimates. The following will demonstrate this point: <br />Percent of Each Species Harvested <br />Duration of Survey RBT BT KOK LT SMB <br />April - September* 89% 54% 96% 61% 100% <br />May - September 85% 42% <br />% 90% <br />90% 57% <br />63% 100% <br />100% <br />May - October 88% <br />93% 46 <br />57% 96% 68% 100% <br />April - October 96% 81% 100% 78% 100% <br />April - November 92% 69% 94% 74% 100% <br />May - November <br />*Months surveyed between intensive survey years (1979-1981). <br />These data show that the current angler surveys, run in years when there is <br />not a full intensity creel census, may not collect enough data to analyze the <br />brown and lake trout harvests. Since 23 percent of the total harvest of brown <br />trout occurs in November, the survey should cover that month if good brown trout <br />-51-