Laserfiche WebLink
<br />These targets were provided by the USBR. They were developed by <br /> <br />combining the criteria from the ASP program and the operational targets <br /> <br />for 1987. The targets are set to maintain sufficient carryover storage to <br /> <br />maintain the minimum power pool while at the same time minimizing spills. <br /> <br />Presumably, the differences between the ASP criteria and the 1987 <br /> <br />operation plan (which are not large) can be explained by the fact that the <br /> <br />ASP model is old. <br /> <br />The above targets are based on average runoff conditions, and in <br /> <br />actual operation the targets for January through June may be violated in <br /> <br />response to above or below average snowpacks. If the snowpack is above <br /> <br />average, Blue Mesa storage contents may be dropped below targets so as to <br /> <br />increase hydropower generation during these months, with the expectation <br /> <br />that the extra runoff will still fill Blue Mesa by the end of June. If <br /> <br />the snowpack portends an exceptionally dry year, Blue Mesa contents may be <br /> <br />kept above targets during these months and hydropower production cut back <br /> <br />so as to increase the chances that the reservoir will fill up by the end <br /> <br />of June even with a low runoff. <br /> <br />The ASP model includes a feature which makes such adjustments based <br /> <br />on a synthesized runoff forecast. Such fine tuning introduces great <br /> <br /> <br />complexity into the model, without changing the important modelling <br /> <br />results and was beyond the scope of this study. The effect of adjusting <br /> <br /> <br />Blue Mesa storage targets based on snowpack conditions, however, can be <br /> <br /> <br />illustrated in an ex post analysis of any of the study scenarios. Such an <br /> <br />WBLA, Inc. 1909 Broadway, #3, Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br /> <br />18 <br />