My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:42 PM
Creation date
7/29/2009 2:57:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.2F
Description
Colorado Supreme Court Appeal
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
7/26/2004
Author
Lee E. Miller, David W. Robbins, Patricia L. Wells, Robert G. Weiss, John M. Dingess
Title
Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
portion of the present City is not yet developed and additional lands may be annexed to the City. <br />Accordingly, it is reasonable to conciude the Aurora water service population will grow. In <br />order to maintain the high level of quality and dependability that Aurora's water service <br />customers deserve, Aurora must be flexible and creative in the operation and expansion of its <br />water supply system, as well as in the reuse of its existing supplies. Aurora's water system <br />currently derives water from the Colorado, Arkansas and South Platte River basins. <br />Additionally, Aurora operates numerous decreed exchanges throughout its system, and <br />anticipates operating additional exchanges in the future, many of which are presently on file with <br />various Water Courts. These exchanges greatly enhance Aurora's operational flexibility and <br />assist in reuse and conservation of its water supplies. Proliferation of recreational water rights <br />that command the entire flow of a river could seriously impede Aurora's ability to operate <br />exchanges, impair the maximum utilization of exiting water supplies and prevent the City from <br />keeping up with its growing demand for water service. <br />The amici, working in cooperation with agencies of the state of Colorado, have each <br />participated in the development and implementation of water resource development plans and <br />proj ects designed to utilize waters to which the state of Colorado is equitably entitled. Each of <br />the amici has sought to recognize the need to correlate the activities of mankind with some <br />reasonable preservation of the natural environment in a manner consistent with the Colorado <br />constitution and state law. Each of the amici has sought to safeguard waters to which Colorado <br />is equitably entitled so thaf water can be conserved, used, and developed through management <br />activities, including storage, exchange and changes in use. The Water Judge's failure in this case <br />7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.