Laserfiche WebLink
to limit the Applicant's claim concerning the size and scope of a wa-ter right for R[CD purposes <br />to the minimum stream flow required for a reasonable recreational experience as required by the <br />RICD statute places these efforts at great risk. The views of these amici will assi-st the Court in <br />understanding ttie issues presented by this appeal and the consequerices of affirnning the water <br />court's decree. <br />Pursuant: to C.A.R. 29, the brief of the amici curiae is conditionally filed with this motion <br />for leave. <br />Respectiully submitted this 26`h day of Juiy, 2004. <br />HILL & ROBBINS, P.C. <br />By: <br />David Z bms, #6112 <br />Denni MorLtgomery, #6424 <br />Jennifer H. Hurit, #29964 <br />1441 18th Street, Suite 100 <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br />Attomeys for T'he Rio Grande Water <br />Conservation L?istrict and <br />Southwestern I'Vater Conservation District <br />BURNS, FIGA & WILL, P.C. <br />Bv: <br />Lee E. Miller, #26663 <br />6400 South Fiddlers Green Circle <br />Suite 1030 <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />Attomey for Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District and the C;olorado Farm <br />Bureau <br />MAYNES, BRADFORD, SHIPPS & <br />SHEFTEL <br />Frank E. (Sam) Maynes, #1363 <br />JohnBarlow Spear, #13878 <br />The West Building <br />Suite 123 <br />835 E. 2nd Av--nue <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />Attorneys for Southwestern Water <br />Conservation District <br />8