My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Proposal for Writing Monitoring Protocols Draft (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Proposal for Writing Monitoring Protocols Draft (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:39:32 PM
Creation date
6/25/2009 9:17:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.300
Description
Land Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/3/1999
Author
Technical Committee
Title
Proposal for Writing Monitoring Protocols Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Committee and the Executive Director's office do not expect to anticipate all the potential <br />problems in implementing the new monitoring program. Therefor it will be necessary for <br />statisticians, GIS personnel, administrators, and others to spend time in the field observing and <br />participating in collection of monitoring data in order to fully understand these practical <br />limitations and to insure that the data will be analyzed properly. Modifications to SOPs during <br />implementation will likely be necessary in newly developed protocols as well as those existing <br />protocols that are adapted for the Program. These activities and costs are not included in the <br />budget of the present proposal. <br />The Executive Director's office has been assisting the Technical Committee in developing the <br />least tern and piping plover protocol (monxtoring potential and known nesting habitat, <br />distribution and number of breeding pairs, and reproductive success of least terns, and piping <br />plover in the central Platte valley). We expect a similar procedure will take place in the <br />development of the remaining protocols. These efforts have been conducted through the current <br />Executive Director's budget and have resulted in a draft protocol for the study design and <br />methods sections that is near completion (see attached draft). Work has not been started for the <br />administration, data sheet and evaluation of existing data sections. The process used to develop <br />the protocol to its current point has been an iterative process of draft preparation and review. <br />This iterative process will be continued in develaping the remaining sections of the protocol. <br />This same type of iterative process would also be employed in developing all new protocols, as <br />well as in evaluating and modifying existing protocols. The Technical Committee and the <br />Executive Director's office anticipate that protocols one, three, five, and seven will require <br />extensive wark, as no existing protocols have been identified for these activities as of the date of <br />this proposal. <br />Identifieation and Evaluation of Existing Data <br />If data exists, a portion of each protocol will include an evaluation of the feasibility of using the <br />data for before/after analysis and other potential analyses during evaluation of the Program. <br />Data sets to be evaluated are those original sources identified in the draft "Documentation of <br />Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley." The evaluation will include development of a <br />"decision matrix". The decision matrix will involve identifying or confirming such things as, are <br />variables clearly and consistently defined from year to year, are there typographic errors in the <br />data set, are original field data sheets available, what form are the data in (e.g., electronic, hard <br />copy), are there obvious errors or missing data, can the data be traced back to an unique site, and <br />are the data derived (madel based) or empirical (raw). Additionally, the decision matrix will be <br />used to evaluate the data for inclusion in a database developed by protocol seven (designing, <br />implementing, and maintaining a database for long-term storage and retrieval of data and reports <br />generated through monitoring and research). The evaluation of existing data will also include <br />recommendations regarding the adequacy of inethods used (e.g., existence of written methods, <br />evidence of probability based sampling, biased methods), relevancy of the resulting data (e.g., <br />maps identifying least tern reproductive habitat), and usability of the data in the Program (e.g., <br />trend analysis, before/after analysis). <br />After data sets are identified and the initial decision matrix has been completed, a siznple data <br />analysis will be conducted as another means to identify potential problems in data sets. In most <br />instances, the Executive Director's office will conduct the small data analysis, but there may be <br />data sets for which another entity is better suited to canduct the analysis (e.g., Bureau of <br />Reclamation in the analysis of GIS data). As an example of a simple data analysis, the mean <br />clutch size of least terns with 95% confidence intervals could be calculated with available data. <br />December 3, 1999 Draft Proposal for Writing Monitoring Protocols
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.