Laserfiche WebLink
protocols will also be identified by examination of the draft "Documentation of Existing <br />Conditions in the Central Platte Valley" completed by URS Greiner Woodward Clyde Federal <br />Services for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. An example of an existing protocol that may be <br />adaptable for the Program is the USGS's current protocol for monitoring flows at their gauging <br />stations. <br />Evaluation of existing protocols will include evaluation of data collection and analysis methods, <br />and if necessary recommendations on how protocols should to be modified. These evaluations <br />will be done by carefully reading protocols and by interviewing key people involved in the <br />development and/or implementation of the protocols. The larger and more detailed protocols <br />may require significant time for evaluation. Evaluation of existing protocols will also include 1) <br />determination of the amount, extent, and quality of the data gathered using the protocols 2) <br />determination of the work necessary to document methods used for collecting data, and 3) <br />determination of the work necessary to put the data in electronic form or format the data for <br />future analysis. Data resulting from these existing protocols will be evaluated for their use as a <br />baseline in evaluating a biological response to the Program (see Identification and Evaluation of <br />Existing Data). <br />The Executive Director's office will assist the Technical Committee in modifying the methods, <br />field design, statistical design, and statistical analysis of protocols that are found to be adaptable <br />for use in the Prograrri. This process will be similar to the iterative process currently being used <br />by the Executive Director's office and the Technical Committee to develop the least tern and <br />piping plover reproductive habitat monitoring protocol. Based on preliminary information, the <br />Technical Committee anticipates there are existing protocols that can be utilized to some degree <br />in two of the activity areas. Detailed protocols are currently in use by the USGS to determine <br />flows, and may be adaptable in part or in whole for use in protocols four and six (both of these <br />protocols require information in addition to that related to flows). <br />Development of New Protocols <br />The Executive Director's office will assist the Technical Committee in developing new protocols <br />for the prioritized activities identified above in which there are not existing adaptable protocols. <br />Protocols will be developed using the Technical Committee's "Protocol Definition/Outline for <br />Monitoring and Research Conducted as part of the Cooperative Agreement and Proposed <br />Program." Protocols will include statistical design, field methods, data analysis, reporting <br />formats, estimated project budget, and bibliography. Proper statistical design will help insure <br />scientific credibility of monitoring data. Field methods will include standard, accepted methods <br />and will be designed to minimize expense while maximizing available information. Proper data <br />analysis and timely report preparation will be necessary for use of the information in adaptive <br />management decisions. All sources used in developing the protocols will be referenced in a <br />bibliography section. The Technical Committee and the Executive Director's office will <br />coordinate with species experts and agencies while developing protocols to maximize the <br />likelihood that all concerns are covered satisfactorily. <br />Unless there is exceptional practical field experience available during interviews and protocol <br />development, additional interaction between statisticians and field biologists will be necessary to <br />fine tune standard operating procedures (SOPs) defined in the protocols. Often, modifications <br />are necessary in the standard operating procedures or in the basic protocol for new monitoring <br />programs because of unanticipated problems with budgets for field work, travel time required, <br />bad weather resulting in lost work days, new uncooperative land owners, etc. The Technical <br />December 3, 1999 Draft Proposal for Writing Monitoring Protocols Page 3 of 9