Laserfiche WebLink
. , <br />Mike Ryan will visit with the contracting officer at Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to get an idea <br />of federal agency options, experiences, and suggestions, for such a policy. Mike Purcell urged <br />all the states to do the same. Jerry Kenny stated it is important to deal with this early in the <br />Program because so many contracts will be involved in Program work. <br />Budget Related Items <br />Process for handling contracts and payment of invoices <br />Jerry Kenny provided an update on using basically the same invoice process for the Program as <br />used during the Cooperative Agreement. Don Kraus said the policy should be updated and <br />linked to the new procurement policy being developed. Discussion followed about how to <br />streamline the process but ensure that RFPs are prepared and reviewed and contracts developed <br />properly. Mike Purcell suggested the concept that the Executive Director's Office would prepare <br />a pre-proposal document with the project scope, budget need, budget line item, budget <br />adjustments, and any other important information included. That pre-proposal would be <br />presented to the Finance Committee for approval before moving into development of a full RFP <br />or contract. If approved by the FC, the ED could move ahead with developing a full proposal. <br />Don Kraus stated this policy would have to be linked to the new procurement policy, and should <br />include thresholds for when budget changes or expenditures need to be reviewed by both the FC <br />and the GC. Brian Barels and Ann Bleed suggested that FC meetings include appropriate tech <br />representatives to help review pre-proposals and provide guidance to the ED. Dale Strickland <br />said this should be included in the policy, and Ann Bleed suggested the Web site could be a <br />helpful way to track information. Jerry Kenny will elaborate on the pre-proposal process, links <br />to the FC and GC, thresholds, and other matters. The GC approved. <br />Task PD-8 - Database Management System <br />Mike Purcell reported that the FC recommends moving ahead with contracting with the FWS <br />team in Ft. Collins to provide the Database Management System for the Program. Jerry Kenny is <br />prepared to move ahead with negotiations, but John Lawson stated he needs to see more detail <br />about this process because it is a sole source issue. Jerry Kenny noted that there has been a <br />written justification developed for going with the FWS team, but that he will add to it and <br />strengthen it to address concerns. Ann Bleed noted that a key for using the FWS is that they are <br />a member organization of the GC and will be around for at least as long as the Program. Mike <br />Purcell stated that if the Program collapses, the data will still be with a public entity that is <br />responsible for ESA compliance and determining if the Program is living up to its obligations. <br />John Lawson said the FC will have to review this again after Jerry updates the written <br />justification. Mike Ryan said the written justification needs to capture the process and the <br />thinking that went into it. <br />Mike Purcell suggested that Jerry Kenny move ahead both with developing a more extensive <br />written justification for sole sourcing the DBMS with the FWS, and also beginning negotiations <br />with the FWS with the caveat that this process will require additional FC and GC review. Jerry <br />will report on the status of this at the October GC meeting. Dan Luecke stated that the meeting <br />summary should indicate that there is not a fatal flaw in this process and that things will move <br />ahead with the FWS in an orderly fashion according to Program document and GC guidance. <br />The GC approved. <br />This document is a draft based on one person's notes of the meeting. The official meeting minutes may be different <br />if corrections are made by the Governance Committee before approval. Page 6 of 8