Laserfiche WebLink
PROJECT APPROACH <br />ADF is that it provides several controls that would reduce development and maintenance. For <br />example, changes to the layer list and legend in the service are automatically reflected in the <br />application, and there is no need to manually change a configuration file or create symbology <br />swatches. The ADF also allows for mashups, making it possible to use free web map services, <br />thus reducing the amount of local data that has to be collected, updated, and maintained. The <br />disadvantage of using ADF is that customizing the controls is difficult. <br />Hood Layers <br />y ^ NFlP Community Status <br />~ ^ Flood Maps <br />k ^ DFIRM Prel m nary L nes <br />~ ^ Lanmer County Exist nq fIR <br />8 ^ Fort GolLnz City Floodplain <br />~ ^ Historical Flocds <br />a ^ Weather Moditicaton <br />CE ^ flcod Control <br />'ri ^MUki-Hazard <br />5 ^~ Flood Outlook <br />.^SNOTEL Sitea 3006-OS-29 <br />~ Data Not Available <br />•1-SO <br />51-300 <br />• > 300 <br />( Q Flood Threat Bulletin <br />®Flood Waminp <br />~FlCOd Watch <br />^hunor Flooding Possible <br />^NO A[trvity <br />31 ^ 7.15 Day flcod Weminq <br />7 ^ SLVE 3006-05.30, Inch <br />;~ ^ Climate <br />B ^Gages <br />^struaur« <br />M O Reference <br />b ^ NFHL <br />m ^ NLCD <br />QTDDegrcphy <br />ib Q NGS USA Topcgrcphic McPs <br />B ^Imagery <br />iH Q USA Drime Imagery <br />~', Seerdt for 'i _. <br />Find <br />.l __. _- <br />I r(. ~ , <br />~-_ ~1 <br />{ - <br />yve~~.~ ~ _.. <br />oe- 3Mi L" <br />~ + roY <br />...+ <br />i' <br />t ~~ _. ~__ <br />s'mwswcr _: <br />i-* . <br />j f t <br />-~, tip'. <br />t lrsrnn~~ <br />f . <br />/•.•~ <br />10 O 20 FiM <br />,:!.~ ::~: ~".r~Lr~ <br />L.ov.aik. <br />yxci q r.„ <br />" ~-nr t v. on n .:J ~~a ae•!vu .xrax <br />4 <br />r~tfk jw C4la;tA 1 ~ [ ~ - <br />n..Ne l aL ~ ,jt{.,, i ~ <br />IYA.Y N <br />zkN e d lvlr:.4~ n ~ _ '. <br />i <br />_ ~ yfw.pn .._ ~ __. _.__ <br />r 1Nt Bl Tllt ..LP ~Rn Crr- 1 ~_~.. .~ <br />- ~ !`~ Se*erc rain-on=snoN Iri higher front range could lead to flood cor3ditlons <br />,4Yr- lT <br />lv 6 2 <br />L nTe ( 1 <br />,P' i .~jt~, <br />/ ~ ... 'i.; A t <br />1 I <br />` ~ Y ~ '' i s <br />c _. <br />_. .-. <br />~, - ~; _ <br />! / - i ura:nu:ii , ~ • -4" sn~u r•rn <br /> J±.lYp ~_- _. ~ . <br />L r`® <br />_ _ __._'_ <br />Morro ve n~a <br />a y~ ;P R ~-Y~31. _._... __.___ .. <br />urecKn <br />' <br />I 'A: _ <br />J tc.•r• <br />ser.. ~. <br />- iulBf r~pEi :r- <br />/~ ~a•- <br />tL. <br />~• <br />' <br />. ;CVWtt RL:TIL <br />~Jryan~~TLlt _ <br />~JY ~ ` <br />L _' ^~____ ! ~_ _ <br />~ -i <br />. <br /> ~~ lad Ltranef ~. 100% <br />f <br />Figure 4-2. Riverside Flood DSS Prototype Using an Alternative Technology of ArcGIS Server and the <br />ArcGIS Web ADF <br />ArcGIS JavaScript API -With this alternative, ArcGIS Server is used as the map server and <br />the ArcGIS JavaScript API is used on the client (Figure 4-3). Using the JS API requires more <br />initial development time than using the ADF, but is easier to customize and it can use web map <br />services. <br />DNR RFP PDA-923 29 R I V E R S I D E <br />