My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7850
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7850
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternatives, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 CHAPTER 1 <br />1 <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Just after the end of World War II the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ("Reclamation") <br /> began a comprehensive inventory of water development potential in the Colorado River basin. <br /> Included in this inventory was the identification of the potential Juniper Reservoir/Deadman <br /> Bench Canal, Maybell, and Cross Mountain projects on the Yampa River mainstem. <br /> Following the 1948 Upper Colorado River Compact and authorization of the Colorado River <br /> Storage Project (which included the Glen Canyon, Curecanti, Navajo, and Flaming Gorge <br /> projects), these Yampa River projects were designated as possible participating projects and <br /> were earmarked for further study. The Colorado River Water Conservation District ("River <br /> District") filed for water rights for the Juniper project shortly after the post-compact studies of <br /> the Yampa and neighboring White River basins were completed by Reclamation in 1957. In <br /> 1962, River District was granted water rights for the project with a 1954 priority date. While <br /> the River District has maintained diligence on the Juniper Project water rights, the development <br /> of the project has not gone forward, largely for economic and environmental reasons. <br />' In 1973, the United States Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Among <br /> other things, the ESA outlined procedures for the identification and listing of endangered <br />' species and called for consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service") on <br />Federal actions that might impact those species. In 1983, the Service officially listed three <br /> species of native Colorado River fishes (the Colorado River squawfish, the Humpback Chub, <br /> <br />' and the Bonytail Chub) as endangered. Since then a fourth (the Razorback Sucker) has been <br />added to the list. <br /> In January of 1988, the Secretary of the Interior signed a cooperative agreement with the <br /> Western Area Power Administration and the governors of the three Upper Basin states of <br /> Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming to implement a recovery plan (known formally as the Recovery <br /> Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin, or <br />' "Recovery Program" for short) for the endangered fishes in the upper Colorado River basin. <br /> This agreement was the product of years of difficult negotiations between state and federal <br /> agencies, water development interests, and environmental organizations. It provides for the <br />1 implementation of a broad range of measures for protection and recovery of the endangered <br /> fishes, including water right acquisistion, habitat management, habitat development and <br /> maintenance, stocking of native species, management of non-native species, and ongoing <br />' research. <br /> Because of its relatively undeveloped state, the Yampa River is believed to contain some <br /> of the largest remaining areas of natural habitat of the endangered Colorado River fishes; it also <br /> contributes significant flows to habitat areas in the Green River. For these reasons the Yampa <br /> River has been assigned highest priority for acquisition of water rights for the Recovery <br />' Program. In July of 1989, the Service published a study evaluating the habitat use, potential <br /> 1-1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.