Laserfiche WebLink
The one hour lead standard for Utah is 82 µg/1, while the 4 <br />,day average is 3.~ µg/1. The three river front ground water <br />stations (M9, 10 and 11) all exceeded both limits, while stations <br />M-4, M-5 and M-6 were also high (Figure 17). No other station- <br />- had detectable levels of lead. The source of lead is unknown. <br />Only-one station had high selenium concentrations, station <br />M-14 at 10 µg/1, and the 4 day average limit is 5 µg/1. <br />The 4 day average-limit for zinc is 110 µg/l and the 1 hour <br />average maximum is 120 µg/1. The sample from station M-11 <br />exceeded both limits. <br />The 4 day average limit for cadmium is 1.1 µg/1 and the 1 <br />hour average maximum is 3.9 µg/1. These levels-were-exceeded in <br />the samples from stations M-6, M-9, M-10, and M-11. <br />The 4 day average limit for copper is 12 µg/1 and-the 1 hour <br />`average maximum is 18 µg/l. Only station M-11 exceeded these <br />limits. <br />The maximum allowable concentration of-iron is 1000 µg/1, <br />and-this was exceeded at station-M-10. When collecting .water <br />samples at stations M-9, M-10, and M-1Z all showed iron <br />precipitation in sample shortly after sample. collection. <br />In general, the stations along the Colorado River (M-9, M- <br />10, and M-11'..all had high-concentrations of one or more metals. <br />The stations located on the eastern side (M-4, M-5 and M-6) also <br />-had high concentrations-of_ one or.more metals. The sources of <br />:these metals is unknown, but most likely .are from groundwater. <br />The surface waters-delivered from Mill Creek are low in metals. <br />One temporary well established northwest of our, station M12 <br />was pumped to collect water for analysis. We noticed that the <br />water effervesced as it came to the surface.- We-used a lighter <br />to test whether the bubbles would ignite, and in fact-the bubbles <br />were of an ignitable gas. Since the gas had the odor of <br />commercial natural gas, we concluded that the substance most <br />likely was not methane, but was gas which escaped from one of the <br />buried .natural gas pipelines that crosses the site. <br />Both field and laboratory water quality data are presented <br />in the Appendix. <br />30 <br />