My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
H, WHIRLING DISEASE <br />History of Myxobolus cerebralis in Colorado <br />On November 25, 1987, Myxobolus cerebralis (MC) was found for the first time in <br />Colorado at a private facility and a nearby state fish hatchery (Mt. Shavano) close to Salida in the <br />Arkansas River drainage. In the two weeks that followed, the organism was also found at a <br />private facility near Creede in the Rio Grande River drainage and at another private fish culture <br />site on Trout Creek, a tributary of the South Platte River in south central Douglas County. Trout <br />collected at a private hatchery north of Fort Collins tested positive for WD on December 15, <br />1987. On February 15, 1988, MC was detected at the Chalk Cliffs Rearing Unit in the Arkansas <br />drainage. By May 1988, the pathogen had been found at 12 locations in Colorado. The list <br />included two state facilities, nine private commercial fish farms, and one private pond on the Air <br />Force Academy. Within a year (1989) 26,262 fish had been sampled for WD from 48 fish culture <br />sites and 182 free-ranging populations. Eleven fish culture sites and 40 free-ranging trout <br />populations (Appendix A) found in 11 of the 15 major drainages tested positive (Appendix B). <br />All fish culture sites found positive for WD were immediately quarantined by order of the <br />director. Presently, the DOW categorizes the WD status of the state's waters using "water codes" <br />(DOW identification system for lake and stream segments). <br />In November 1987, the DOW employed one full-time fish pathologist and received <br />assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Fish Health Laboratory in Ft. <br />Morgan, Colorado. After WD was found in Colorado, the DOW immediately rented laboratory <br />space to start a WD diagnostic center and hired three temporary employees under the direction of <br />the state fish pathologist to staff the facility. The USFWS provided the services of a certified fish <br />pathologist for one year to assist in determining how widespread WD was in Colorado. The <br />Director of the DOW also initiated a task force to guide the program. The task force consisted of <br />one lawyer from the attorney general's office, a DOW fish pathologist, one person from the Law <br />Enforcement Section, two fish researchers, a USFWS fish pathologist, one employee from the <br />Public Affairs Section; and other individuals from within and outside the DOW, as needed. The <br />whole group was under the direction of the state fish manager. Also, as required by regulation, <br />other government agencies were consulted in the decision-making process. Total effort, minus <br />legal services, on WD in Colorado from November 24, 1987, to July 31, 1988, amounted to <br />7,600 hours of labor and an expenditure of $172,000. <br />An emergency conference on WD held in Denver on April 12-14, 1988, was attended by <br />approximately 70 people representing university and agency research communities, as well as a <br />variety of state, federal, and private fishery programs. The Colorado River Fish and Wildlife <br />Council (CRFWC) fish disease subcommittee conducted the meeting and, with the information <br />generated, developed a conference statement that was presented to all fish health representatives <br />of the member states for discussion as well as the entire assembled group. Minor changes were <br />suggested and incorporated by the committee. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.