Laserfiche WebLink
FINAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: "The fish disease subcommittee for the CRFWC, having <br />reviewed information presented at the WD conference, has determined that the status of the <br />disease should be reevaluated and reassigned. The considerable expertise at the conference <br />represented both historic .and current perspectives pertaining to WD (Myxobolus cerebralis). The <br />fish disease subcommittee recommended that whirling disease be included in the "notifiable <br />pathogen" category (removing it as an emergency prohibitive disease) of the fish disease control <br />policy of the CRFWC." The subcommittee further concluded that "fish with confirmed presence <br />of WD should be liberated only in waters where there is confirmed presence of the pathogen. It is <br />important that infected fish not be released where the spores may become established in the wild." <br />In 1988 the only authority the Director had was to quarantine hatcheries found positive for <br />WD. Beginning with the first discovery of WD in Colorado, all WD+ hatcheries (state and <br />private) were immediately quarantined. No fish or eggs were allowed to be removed from any <br />facility found positive for MC. Criteria were eventually developed by the DOW's task force to <br />allow limited removal of fish from quarantined hatcheries. Other concerned and involved agencies <br />were also contacted. At the time (1988), regulation required approval by other government <br />agencies in writing before stocking any fish from a WD-positive hatchery on the land(s) under <br />their control. The DOW considered the appropriate resource agencies to include the Bureau of <br />Land Management, Colorado Department of Park and Outdoor Recreations, U. S. Department of <br />Defense, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Forest Service. The proposed criteria and an <br />overview of the entire WD situation were presented in a public meeting at DOW headquarters on <br />January 22, 1988. Input from the private sector was received at that time. Following additional <br />review and revision, the first criteria for fish removal were approved by the Director on March 4, <br />1988 and the CWC on March 11, 1988, and were put into effect beginning March 14, 1988. <br />A new WD policy was put into effect on July 1, 1988, and continued through November 30, <br />1988. The policy was the result of new information obtained from the WD conference previously <br />discussed, consultation with other agencies, and a public meeting on June 22, 1988. The amended <br />policy was very similar to the policy that expired on June 30, 1988. Changes in the new policy <br />addressed misinterpretations, clerical issues, and simplifying the total process. On July 11, 1988, <br />as a result of the CRFWC decision to downlist WD to the "notifiable" category, the stocking <br />criteria for the new policy were modified; stocking of fish from quarantined hatcheries would be <br />allowed on the west slope. However, protected sites were established for Colorado River <br />cutthroat trout and Rio Grande cutthroat trout. Self-sustaining populations of rainbow and brook <br />trout were dropped from the protected criteria. All other stocking criteria remained in effect. As <br />a DOW internal policy, stocking of fish from DOW WD-positive facilities on the west slope did <br />not start until the spring of 1992. In addition, regional biologists were instructed not to request <br />fish from quarantined DOW hatcheries in or near sites where spawn-taking operations were <br />conducted. <br />In November of 1988 an Environmental Assessment (EA) was completed on stocking fish <br />from WD-positive hatcheries on federal government lands. After a public comment period, the <br />EA was approved. <br />5