My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8057
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 11:22:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8057
Author
Bennett, J. R., D. A. Krieger, T. P. Nesler, L. E. Harris and R. B. Nehring.
Title
An Assessment Of Fishery Management And Fish Production Alternatives To Reduce The Impact Of Whirling Disease In Colorado.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Thompson, Fryingpan, and Dolores rivers) which have tested positive yet have shown no <br />significant population impacts. DOW 's Aquatic Resources/Hatchery personnel estimate that the <br />range of the parasite may be expanding by about 5% per year (in Deloitte & Touche 1995). <br />Over the years, Colorado's hatchery system has had to deal with potentially devastating <br />problems such as diseases, water quality and quantity issues, and parasitic infestations. Until <br />recently, most fish pathologists believed WD would not negatively impact wild trout populations <br />(Anonymous 1988). This belief was based mainly on hatchery experience and the fact that there <br />were no published studies indicating otherwise. Results of the first study documenting the <br />impacts of a controlled quantitative exposure of very young rainbow trout to a very low dose of <br />the MC pathogen were published by Markiw in 1991. In hatcheries, WD is a malady that rarely <br />causes mortalities or leaves trout permanently impaired (Markiw 1992). Many fish pathologists <br />and fishery managers assumed if trout survived infections of the WD parasite in a hatchery, the <br />disease would not affect trout in the wild. This assumption was based on the belief that hatchery <br />conditions were undoubtedly more stressful than what exists in the wild environment. However, <br />the results in a recently completed study on the Colorado River (Walker and Nehring 1995; <br />Nehring and Walker 1996), as well as results of other investigations in Montana (Vincent 1996) <br />and Utah, clearly demonstrate that WD in the wild is a reality in the intermountain west. <br />Table 1. Approximate warmwater stream miles and surface acres, and coldwater stream miles <br />and surface acres in Colorado, and their "whirling disease" status. <br /> WARMWATER COLDWATER <br /> STREAMS LAKES STREAMS LAKES <br /> N MILES N ACRES N MILES N ACRES <br />WD+' na na 44 6703 21 10,400 <br />Other2 16 529 437 116,300 8,857 53,230 3,046 103,900 <br />Total 16 529' T71 116,340 8,901 53,900" 3,067 114,300 <br />'Waters where the presence of WD has been confirmed by statistically-valid testing. <br />'These numbers were obtained by subtracting WD+ data from the total. This group includes untested waters <br />and a small number of stream miles (<100) testing negative. <br />'A total of 2,550 miles have been exposed to WD by stocking; 670 miles have tested positive. <br />'Represents perennial and ephemeral streams.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.