My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9588
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:32:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9588
Author
Bestgen, K. R. and e. al.
Title
Population Status of Colorado Pikeminnow in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado.
USFW Year
2005.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
inherent in most estimating models in program CAPTURE. Because capture probabilities of <br />individuals often vary spatially or over time (this study), it is useful to adjust probabilities of <br />capture by a covariate (here TL) that is known to affect rates of capture of the animals in the <br />sample. Use of a continuous covariate such as fish length results in different probabilities of <br />capture for fish of different lengths, and each then contributes differently to the abundance <br />estimate. For example, for every 500-mm-TL Colorado pikeminnow captured that has a <br />hypothetical and relatively high probability of capture of 0.20, there must be an additional four <br />individuals of that size in the population that were not captured (1 / 0.2 = 5 total pikeminnow of <br />that size in the population). Alternatively, if a relatively larger 800-mm-TL Colorado <br />pikeminnow was captured that has a lower probability of capture of 0.05, that means there may <br />be an additional 19 individuals in the population that were not captured (1 / 0.05 = 20 total <br />pikeminnow of that size). The abundance estimate for the population results from summing the <br />total number of fish captured and not captured. It is important to remember that probabilities of <br />capture are themselves estimated quantities with associated variances and their accuracy is <br />fundamental to the accuracy and precision of abundance estimates. <br />As was apparent from model selection, probabilities of capture were relatively low and <br /> <br />varied widely among sampling occasions, reaches, and years (Table 8). Maximum capture <br />probabilities (usually for a Colorado pikeminnow about 580-mm TL) were relatively low and <br />ranged from about 0.01 to 0.20. Average probabilities of capture were slightly higher for the <br />White River and the lower Green River reach than for the other reaches. Average annual values <br />of probabilities of capture were lower for most river reaches in 2002 and 2003, drought years <br />characterized by a short run-off period and a low maximum discharge level. Average <br />33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.