My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9434
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:16:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9434
Author
Chart, T. E., K. L. Orchard, J. C. Schmidt, K. S. Day, K. D. Christopherson, C. Crosby and L. Lynch.
Title
Flaming Gorge Studies
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Reproduction and Recruitment of Gila Spp. and Colorado Pikeminnow in the Middle Green River.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Utah State University was responsible for handling the geomorphic analyses which are presented <br />in Report A. Utah Division of Wildlife employees from the Vernal, Utah, office focused on both <br />the physical and biological characterization of Gila spp. and pikeminnow-nursery habitats <br />(Report B). Personnel from the Moab Field Station conducted the monitoring /pikeminnow <br />spawning investigation trip amiually (Report C). Several of the objectives (particularly within <br />the suite of biological objectives) were handled by more than one research team and are <br />addressed in more than one final report. In Table 1, the project objectives are listed and reader is <br />directed to the pertinent final. report(s). <br />Table 1. Study objectives for Flaming Gorge Project No. 39. Reports are referenced as follows: <br />A- Orchard and Schmidt 1998; B -Day et al. 1999; and C -Chart and Lentsch 1998. <br />Objectives: Geomorphic Component Addressed in: <br />Construct maps of surface flow patterns of several reaches identifying and delineating A <br />hydraulic habitat units and quantifying flow characteristics. <br />Construct maps of geologic deposits and vegetation status at water's edge so associations A <br />can be made between flow patterns and shoreline type <br />Quantify spatial and temporal changes in Gila spp. habitats under various discharges A(eddies); B <br /> (nursery habitats) <br />Compare results with similar research in the Grand Canyon to determine difference in. Cursorily addressed <br />habitat use by the chubs and maintenance of those habitats in A <br />Objectives: Biologic Component <br />Determine timing of Grla spp. reproduction in Deso/Gray and how it is affected by Green B,C <br />River flows. <br />Determine reproductive success, growth rates, and habitat use of the early life stages of B,C <br />Gila spp. as affected by Green River flows <br />Continue PIT tagging al] juvenile and adult Gila spp. and develop age and growth C <br />analysis to determine Gila spp. recruitment rates and year class strength as affected by <br />Green River flows <br />Determine if pikeminnow spawning occurs at locations other than the documented Three C <br />Fords site (Tyus 1983). <br />Accumulate sufficient biological and geomorphic information in Deso/Gray pikeminnow B <br />nursery habitats to allow for comparison with the ongoing Nursery Habitat study being <br />conducted on the upper and lower Green River. <br />Monitor trends in the non-target fish community (e.g. decline in abundance of native C <br />catostomids and increasing non-native channel catftsh) that are affected by Green River <br />hydrology. <br />a <br />~<.3 <br />1V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.