Laserfiche WebLink
METHODS <br />Geomorphic Component <br />Flow patterns and the location of shorelines were mapped in the four study reaches to <br />measure the areal extent and distribution of eddies and low-velocity zones at a wide range of <br />discharges. These data were combined with data describing substrate and bank materials. Maps <br />were made at discharges between 2,100 and 27,000 ft3/s. Surficial geology of the river corridor <br />was mapped to determine the distribution of alluvial. deposits, and to compare and contrast the <br />relationship between these deposits and available habitat in each of the study reaches. Cross <br />sections of the channel were measured to help characterize the geomorphic variability within and <br />between reaches. Finally, historical oblique photos taken in Desolation and Gray Canyons were <br />located through archival searches. These photo sites were located in the field, and photos were <br />matched to identify geomorphic changes.that have taken place in the past (refer to Report A for a <br />more in-depth discussion of methods). <br />Biological Component <br />Nursery Habitat <br />Backwater and low velocity flow habitats of Desolation and Gray Canyons were sampled <br />four times each year from 1994 through 1996 for the presence of endangered fish. The samples <br />were timed to coincide with critical periods in the lives of YOY chubs and Colorado pikeminnow <br />post swim-up (late July/early August), fall (late September/early October) and post-winter (late <br />March early April). <br />In June, 1994, every backwater encountered between RK 345.9 and RK 212.4 was <br />sampled. The same sampling regime was attempted in July, 1994, but because of the large <br />number of backwaters encountered, this was abalidoned at RK 281.6, from which point only the <br />first backwater encountered in each 1.6 km section was sampled. Due to high water, June <br />sampling was eliminated from 1995 and i 996 and also July.1995. April 1997 was canceled <br />because it was thought to be too early to effectively sample swim-up. All subsequent sampling <br />coincided with established adult chub monitoring stations previously established by UDWR {RK <br />301.7-293.6, RK 285.6-277.6, RK 261.5-253.4 (all in Desolation Canyon) and RK 237.3-229.3 <br />(Gray Canyon)} (Figure 1). <br />Sampling began at the upstream end of the study reach and continued in a downstream <br />direction. Backwaters were sampled by a crew of four- to six. Each backwater encountered was <br />approached with caution in an attempt to avoid "wash" entering the backwater from the boats. <br />Two types of sampling were conducted: habitat features and fish community. <br />Habitat Features Sam~g <br />Backwater habitat measurements and observations were taken along three transects. All <br />physical measurements were made after seining to avoid disturbing the fish. The length (m) of <br />each backwater was measured from the center of the mouth to the extreme upper end using tapes, <br />range finders or known paces. Width measurements (m) of each backwater were taken across the <br />mouth and at 1/3 and 2/3 the distance from the mouth to the upper end. Depth (m) measurements <br />were taken along each width transect with a 2 m staff gauge. The deepest point along each width <br />v <br />