Laserfiche WebLink
hydrograph when water temperatures near 20°C. Larvae drift great distances from the hatching <br />site before occupying backwater habitats in nursery areas. The use of backwaters by young <br />pikeminnow has been reported by several authors. Haines and Tyus (1990) stated that Colorado <br />pikeminnow used backwaters greater than 0.15 m deep and were found more frequently in <br />backwater with surface area greater than 750 mZ. Tyus and Haines (1991} also reported <br />pikeminnow used backwater that were deeper, warmer (mean 2°C) and more turbid than those <br />not used. Concurrent investigations of pikeminnow nursery habitat use in the low gradient <br />stretches of the Green River above and below Deso/Gray report similar findings (Trammell and <br />Chart 1999; Day et a1.1999b). However neither of these researchers found a direct correlation <br />with catch rate of YOY pikeminnow and habitat availability. Habitat availability was negatively <br />correlated with the spring peak in both areas. Previous descriptions of YOY pikeminnow habitat <br />use in canyon bound stretches of the Green River are lacking. <br />The goal of this project (Flaming Gorge Project No. 39) was to determine if test flows <br />from Flaming Gorge Dam optimize habitats needed for adequate reproduction and recruitment of <br />Gila spp. and. Colorado pikeminnow in this portion of the Middle Green River or to propose <br />modifications to existing recommendations as needed. To address this goal, three related studies <br />were conducted. The first study (Report A: Orchard and Schmidt 1998) dealt with the effect of <br />varying flow levels on the availability of low velocity eddies, a habitat preferred by the juvenile <br />and adult life stages of endangered humpback chub. Extent anal distribution of eddies were <br />mapped at flows ranging between 2,100 and 27;000 cubic feet per second (cfs). In addition, <br />changes in the channel geometry since the 1920's were determined through examination of <br />historical photographs. From that analysis, presumed long term changes in the availability of <br />eddy habitat was modeled. <br />The second study (Report B: Day et al. 1999) was designed to determine reproductive <br />success of Gila spp. and Colorado pikeminnow and establish a link between the fgrmation and <br />maintenance of preferred nursery habitat and Green River flow. Sampling trips occurred <br />throughout the summer, fall and spring to track the relative abundance of these species and <br />characterize their habitat use. <br />The third study (Report C: Chart and Lentsch 1998) focused on monitoring the entire fish <br />community which provided a measure of Gila spp. and. Colorado pikeminnow recruitment to <br />Age l+ and later life stages. Monitoring consisted of one mid-summer sampling trip each year <br />of the study, which. incorporated a variety of sampling techniques. A corollary to the monitoring <br />efforts was investigations into suspected Colorado pikeminnow spawning at locations other than <br />the documented site at Three Fords rapid (RK 250). Although this study was not initiated as part <br />of the Flaming Gorge studies until 1994, i.e., a three year study, pre-project data were <br />incorporated whenever possible. <br />STUDY OBJECTIVES <br />The goal of these studies was to determine if test flows from Flaming Gorge Dam <br />optimize habitats needed for adequate reproduction and recruitment of Gila spp and Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Middle Green River or to propose modifications to existing <br />recommendations. There were a total often project objectives as identified in the original scope <br />of work: six dealt with the biological component; four addressed the geomorphic component. <br />iii <br />