Laserfiche WebLink
Colorado pikeminnow nursery areas are. Non-native species were found in lower densities in Westwater <br />Canyon than above or below the canyon - again a function of canyon habitat availability. Non-native <br />densities were negatively correlated with the peak flow at the State Line gage. <br />The analysis of chub recruitment was based on a comparison of cohort (as determined by length <br />frequency analysis) densities (electrofishing CPE) relative from year to year. From this analysis, it <br />appeared the 1994 cohort recruited the best; the 1993 cohort the worst. YOY produced in 1994, although <br />not particularly abundant, had grown larger (45 mm TL by mid-August) than either the 1992 or 1993 <br />cohorts. In addition, overwinter flows for the 1994 YOY cohort were lower and more stable than <br />experienced by the other two cohorts. Survival of all juvenile chubs (> 100 mm TL) appeared to be high, <br />although not quantified. <br />The humpback chub population in Westwater Canyon was monitored at three sites established <br />for the Interagency Standardized Monitoring Program (ISMP): Miner's Cabin (RK 199.9 - 198.6), <br />Cougar Bar (RK 194.4 - 193.6), and Hades bar (RK 192.2 - 191.8). Densities of adult humpback chub, <br />as referenced by trammel net CPE (fish / 23 m net hour), fluctuated greatly from trip to trip but overall <br />remained fairly stable -with the trend in CPE slightly up at Miner's Cabin and slightly down at the other <br />two. The same data for roundtail chub indicated a relatively strong downward trend at all sites. Lincoln- <br />Peterson population estimates, although compromised by large 95% confidence intervals, showed a <br />similar trend in population size for the two species. <br />LIST OF KEY WORDS <br />Colorado River, Westwater Canyon, humpback chub, roundtail chub, reproduction, recruitment, <br />monitoring, population estimates, flow recommendations <br />xii <br />