My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9545
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9545
Author
Chart, T. E. and L. Lentsch.
Title
Flow Effects on Humpback Chub (Gila cypha) in Westwater Canyon - Final Report.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Aspinall-46,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />This five year study to determine the effect of Colorado River flows on the humpback chub (Gila <br />cypha) reproduction and recruitment is a component of the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) <br />Aspinall Studies. The purpose of the Aspinall studies is to provide the United States Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (FWS) with adequate biological and physical data to support flow recommendations which will <br />be included in their Final Biological Opinion on the operation of the Aspinall Unit on the Gunnison <br />River. The biological base for current flow recommendations in the Upper Basin focuses on the <br />relationship between Colorado pikeminnow population dynamics and observed flows. The goal of this <br />project was to develop relationships between observed flows and humpback chub life history. To meet <br />this goal, the following study objectives were identified: determine spawning and nursery requirements, <br />,- describe the relationship between geomorphic processes of sediment transport and nursery habitat <br />formation, identify and describe reproductive isolating mechanisms, and assess recruitment. It became <br />apparent early in the study that sampling for adults during the suspected spawning period was not <br />feasible. Targeted habitats could not be sampled efficiently when flows exceeded 6000 cfs. Radio <br />telemetry would be a requisite component of determining spawning habitat for humpback chub in <br />Westwater Canyon. Radio telemetry was discussed in the project proposal as an approach to addressing <br />this issue, but was never identified as a task due primarily to funding constraints. Therefore, to meet the <br />goal of providing a flow recommendation for humpback chub, we focused on monitoring early life stage <br />and nursery habitats to develop relationships between Colorado River flow and humpback chub <br />reproductive success. Considerable effort was also directed at monitoring juvenile and adult fishes to <br />determine levels of recruitment and species (native and nonnative) interactions. A similar approach was <br />taken on the Green River in Desolation Canyon as part of the Flaming Gorge Studies. <br />The humpback chub, originally described from specimens collected in Grand Canyon of the <br />Colorado River in 1945 (Miller 1946), has been found in several canyon-bound areas of the upper basin: <br />Black Rocks, Westwater Canyon, and Cataract Canyon of the Colorado River; and, Desolation /Gray <br />Canyon and Yampa Canyon in the Green River sub-basin. The Westwater Canyon population, <br />discovered in 1979 during the FWS's Colorado River Fishery Project and monitored annually since by <br />the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (i1DWR), is likely the largest population of humpbacks in the <br />upper basin. <br />The present study represents the most intensive sampling effort in this canyon. Greater emphasis <br />has been placed on the earlier life stages than has been in the past. Although the early life history work <br />in this study was patterned after concurrent UDWR studies of Colorado pikeminnow nursery habitat <br />requirements and habitat /flow relationships, it was soon evident that even at the earlier life stages <br />habitat use /behavior of native chubs differed greatly from Colorado pikeminnow. Native chubs <br />complete life cycles in short sections of the river (Valdez and Clemmer 1982). The steep walled, deep <br />canyon habitats of Westwater Canyon that were known to harbor juvenile and adult roundtail and <br />humpback chub also provide the nursery areas for young of year (YOY). Scour channel backwaters <br />formed in runoff deposited sediments, which are preferred by pikeminnow (Trammel and Chart 1998a; <br />1998b) are used, but not preferred, by YOY humpback chubs. Additionally, Westwater Canyon YOY <br />chubs vacate low velocity habitats for main channel habitats (shorelines, shoreline eddies and riffles) <br />earlier in development than Colorado pikeminnow, similar to the findings of researchers in the Grand <br />Canyon of the Colorado River and the Little Colorado River (Rich Valdez, personal communication). <br />The early life stages of Colorado River Gila spp. are not easily identified to species. Two <br />species, roundtail chub and humpback chub are commonly found in Westwater Canyon. The last <br />documented collection of a bonytail came in 1984 ten miles upstream of Westwater Canyon in the Black <br />Rocks area (Kaeding et al. 1986 }. Based on the findings of this study and others (McAda et al. 1994, <br />Valdez et al. 1982), we know YOY chubs are found in the presence of adult fish -larvae do not drift <br />downstream as far as Colorado pikeminnow. Based on the distribution of adults chubs -humpbacks <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.