My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9545
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/24/2009 7:15:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9545
Author
Chart, T. E. and L. Lentsch.
Title
Flow Effects on Humpback Chub (Gila cypha) in Westwater Canyon - Final Report.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Aspinall-46,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUNIlVIARY <br />This five year study to determine the effect of Colorado River flows on humpback chub (Gila <br />cypha) reproduction and recruitment is a component of the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) <br />Aspinall Studies. The goal of this project was to develop relationships between observed flows and <br />humpback chub life history responses, concentrating on the earlier life stages. To meet this goal, the <br />following study objectives were identified: determine spawning and nursery requirements, describe the <br />relationship between geomorphic processes of sediment transport and nursery habitat formation, identify <br />and describe reproductive isolating mechanisms, and assess recruitment. Similar research is being <br />conducted on the Green River in Desolation Canyon as part of the Flaming Gorge Studies. <br />' Three components of the Westwater Canyon fish community were studied: the young of year <br />(YOY), juveniles (AGE 1+ and 2+) and late juvenile /adults. Both humpback chub (Gila cypha) and <br />roundtail chub (G. robusta) are common in Westwater Canyon. Unlike some Upper Basin chub <br />populations, the adults of these two Gila spp. are morphologically distinct in Westwater Canyon. <br />However, young chubs are difficult to identify to species wherever more than one of these species is <br />found. YOY sampling was therefore broken into sub-reaches: above Westwater Canyon (where only <br />roundtail chubs are common), within Westwater Canyon (roundtail and humpback are equally <br />represented in the adult fish community) and below the canyon (where roundtail chubs are present in low <br />numbers and humpback chub are absent). YOY were sampled with seines. Juvenile chubs were <br />monitored with shoreline electrofishing in the canyon, and late juvenile and adults were sampled with <br />hoop and trammel nets as well as with electrofishing. The design of the study focused on YOY densities <br />(fish ! m2 of seined habitat) and habitat use to establish relationships with observed flows. Juvenile <br />chubs (still not readily identified to species) were monitored in the canyon to take the flow /reproduction <br />relationship to the next step. Only three of the five cohorts produced during this study (1992, 1993, and <br />1994) could be tracked past their first summer (Age 0); the 1995 cohort was virtually non-existent and <br />further monitoring of the 1996 cohort was beyond the scope of this study. Late juvenile and adult chubs <br />were monitored to determine population trend and stability in light of the recent recruitment. Pre-project <br />data were incorporated into these analyses. <br />Hatching time and growth of young Gila spp. were correlated with flow parameters (peak flow at <br />State Line gage and pre-peak flow in excess of 6000 cfs (a cumulative flow metric similar to degree <br />days)) and water temperature (degree days > 10°C prior to June 15}. In general, YOY chubs hatched <br />earlier above the canyon indicating roundtails likely spawned earlier than humpbacks. Catch rates of <br />YOY Gila spp. were greatest in the above-canyon sub-reach with a project high density, .679 ,recorded <br />there during July and August of 1993. The greatest density of YOY chubs within Westwater Canyon <br />was nearly as high, .673, recorded during the summer of 1996. The catch rates of chubs were <br />significantly higher in the above-canyon and canyon sub-reaches than in the sub-reach below the canyon. <br />Reproductive success as measured by densities of YOY chubs was positively correlated with the <br />previous year's peak flow, and negatively correlated with the amount the June monthly mean flow <br />deviated from the historic monthly mean. The greatest canyon catch rates occurred when the river <br />peaked near 30,000 cfs. A multinomial analysis indicated YOY chubs used backwater habitats as they <br />were available, but did not select for them. Similar use was recorded in embayments and shoreline <br />habitats within Westwater Canyon. Habitat availability within Westwater Canyon was not dependent on <br />the spring peak as much as instantaneous flow. Nursery habitats were basically any low velocity area, <br />whether that be a typical secondary channel backwater or merely a sculpted area in the shoreline bedrock <br />(referred to as embayments). Achi-square analysis of presence /absence YOY chub in Westwater <br />Canyon by habitat depth indicated no selection -supporting the finding of opportunistic habitat use. <br />Habitat depth was positively correlated with peak flows and more strongly correlated with flows at the <br />time of sampling. Shallow habitats were defined as those having a maximum depth < 0.7 m. Much of <br />the available habitat within Westwater Canyon was not formed by sediment deposition as the classic <br />xi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.