My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9425
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9425
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 7:29:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9425
Author
Bezzerides, N. and K. Bestgen.
Title
Status Review of Roundtail Chub
USFW Year
2002.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />taxonomy continues to evolve. Most recently, Hinckley and DeMarais (2000} suggested <br />elevating Gila robusta grahami to Gila nigra. Recognition of specific status for robusta <br />' subspecies, as has also occurred for Gila robusta seminttda (now = Gila seminuda) and <br />Gila robusta elegans (now = Gila elegans), has significant implications for management, <br />but will not be further addressed by this report (see Table 4 for currently recognized <br />Colorado River Basin Gila species). The specific name robusta is from "robustus" <br />' meaning stout (La Rivers 1994). <br />' i <br />b <br /> Table 4 Currently reco spec <br />es. _ <br />~izal Colorado River Basin Gila species and su <br /> I ann Name Comtnon Name <br /> ~. eyp}~ humpback chub <br />e G. elegans bonytail <br /> G. intermedia Gila chub <br /> G. nigra'~ <br />robusta jordani <br />G headwater chub <br />Pahranagat roundtail chub <br /> . <br />G. robusta robusta Colorado River roundtail chub <br /> G semirtuda Virgin River roundtail chub <br />' 'Recently recommended for elevation to specific status (from G. robusta graham~~ <br />Physical description-Descriptive information presented below is summarized <br />' from Jordan and Evermann (1896), EIIis (1914), Hinckley (1973), Snyder (1981), <br />Douglas et al. (1989), Sublette et al. (1990), Baxter and Stone (1995), Sigler and Sigler <br />(199b), Douglas et al. (1998), and others noted in the text. No single morphologic <br />character or meristic count can be used for accurate identification of G. robusta because <br />' the species is highly variable in most traits. However, a suite of characters has been used <br />to reliably identify most specimens (Douglas et al. 1989,1998, McElroy et al. 1997). <br />Like other Gila, body form of roundtail chub is elongated and fusiform. Roundtail chub <br />may have a somewhat flattened head, but are lacking the nuchal hump found in <br />humpback chub and, to some extent, bonytail. The mouth is large, sub-terminal, and <br />' associated with an acute snout. Eyes are small, low, and anteriorly placed on the head. <br />Fins are generally large. Pectorals are pointed (fin rays' 14-15[12-17]); dorsal fin weakly <br />' 'Counts (fin ray, vertebrae, dentition, etc.) are presented with the most commonly reported count outside <br />the brackets and the range of values encountered in the literature inside the brackets. <br />Final Report September 21h12 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.